740 16v vs. Turbo

Discussion in 'Volvo 740' started by Mike \Rotor\ Nowak, Aug 7, 2003.

  1. Hello Everyone,

    I have a good friend that I have managed to talk into a Volvo, and he is
    currently up in the air between a 744 16v and 744 Turbo as the sedan to look
    for (ideally with a manual transmission). He likes the numbers from both
    engines -- the low down brute of the Turbo and the high rev power of the
    16v -- but is not sure of any more differences between the two. Can anyone
    shed any light on the pros and cons of these two engines? I'm a big D24T
    fan, so I can attest to no knowledge of those non-smoking fours ;)

    Thanks in advance!
    Mike
     
    Mike \Rotor\ Nowak, Aug 7, 2003
    #1
  2. Mike \Rotor\ Nowak

    Peter Milnes Guest

    744 16 valve has 155 bhp 744 Turbo (2.3) has 165 bhp. The 16 valver has good top
    end and reasonable torque throughout its rev range, The turbo is higher up the
    revs delivering power but has less low-down torque than the 16 valver. With 16
    valver the cambelt needs to be changed WITH the balance shaft drive belt, no
    balance shaft on Turbo.

    Cheers, Peter.

    : Hello Everyone,
    :
    : I have a good friend that I have managed to talk into a Volvo, and he is
    : currently up in the air between a 744 16v and 744 Turbo as the sedan to look
    : for (ideally with a manual transmission). He likes the numbers from both
    : engines -- the low down brute of the Turbo and the high rev power of the
    : 16v -- but is not sure of any more differences between the two. Can anyone
    : shed any light on the pros and cons of these two engines? I'm a big D24T
    : fan, so I can attest to no knowledge of those non-smoking fours ;)
    :
    : Thanks in advance!
    : Mike
    :
    :
     
    Peter Milnes, Aug 8, 2003
    #2
  3. Mike \Rotor\ Nowak

    Mike F Guest

    The turbo has way more torque than the 16 valve, as long as you're above
    1500 so the turbo can build some boost. This is especially true with
    the smaller turbos introduced on the 1990 models. With the turbos, you
    just need to wait a fraction of a second for the power, to give the
    turbo time to spool up.
     
    Mike F, Aug 8, 2003
    #3
  4. Mike \Rotor\ Nowak

    James Sweet Guest

    Why? It's a great motor, you just have to make sure you change the timing
    belt on time. Combine the 16v head with a turbo and you can get some
    incredible power.
     
    James Sweet, Aug 9, 2003
    #4
  5. Mike \Rotor\ Nowak

    Peter Milnes Guest

    Sounds like your advice then! Pity words don't stop ships. On what do you base
    your seeming wisdom? Have you owned one? Do you know that it has almost the same
    power as the 8-valve turbo? The engine should feel smoother as it uses balance
    shafts. Anyway I doubt you could pick up a moped engine let alone a real man's
    machine.

    Cheers, Peter.

    : The 16 valve is a piece of shit best used as a boat anchor.
    :
    :
    :
     
    Peter Milnes, Aug 10, 2003
    #5
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.