850 Emissions

Discussion in 'Volvo 850' started by paof6, Apr 27, 2008.

  1. paof6

    paof6 Guest

    A mechanic replaced a 1997 850 engine with a 1994 without permission.
    He modified components to get it to fit in the 97 engine compartment.
    The car needed to pass the emissions test and it failed. Does anyone
    know what the differences are in the emissions systems between those
    two years? I know that the heads are different. The 94 engine runs
    beautifully. Can the emissions be brought in line with the 97?
     
    paof6, Apr 27, 2008
    #1
  2. paof6

    Tim.. Guest

    I dont quite understand?

    If the replacement engine bears the same engine code (i.e. 2.5 20v would be
    a B5254FS) then the original management system will run it in the later car
    and confirm to the emissions standard.

    The engines did not change between years (internally or fuel system), and
    you would have no difficulties.

    Tim..
     
    Tim.., Apr 27, 2008
    #2
  3. A mechanic replaced a 1997 850 engine with a 1994 without permission.
    How much was replaced, only the shortblock with head or also ECU etc.
    Is it replaced with the exact same type of engine?

    The Volvo engines havent changed much if any these years, so shouldnt be a
    problem getting it running correct. Try reading the error codes to get an
    idea of where the problem is or say what part of the emission test it has
    failed on. Might only be some air leak, not unreasonable to think of if an
    engine transplant has been done.

    Greetings Niels
     
    Niels Bengaard, Apr 27, 2008
    #3
  4. paof6

    dupree8995 Guest

    Hi Folks....

    How are emissions tested where you register the car?

    Most jurisdictions test OBD II vehicles [1996 and newer] by plugging
    into the DLC and reading the readiness status of the car....active
    codes, pending codes and clear readiness monitors. Some, however,
    simply analyze exhaust gasses by means of a probe in the tailpipe.

    Your 1997 model should fall into the former category...testing by
    electronic reading of the vehicle data systems. Is your MIL [check
    engine light] illuminated? Does it work when you turn on the ignition,
    then go out when the car starts and runs?

    Previous commentators are correct in that there is no significant
    mechanical difference between a 94 and a 97 engine. So long as the
    management system is from a 97 then you should have no problem passing
    a smog test.

    Let us know the outcome.

    Best Regards

    wharf rat
    las vegas, NV
     
    dupree8995, Apr 28, 2008
    #4
  5. paof6

    John Horner Guest

    In California as least what he did is a no-no. You can't take a
    vehicle backwards to an earlier model year engine and if they discover
    you have done so it flunks the smog test even if the emissions sniffer
    says aok.

    There are lots of details which may well be different from the '94 to
    the '97.
     
    John Horner, May 4, 2008
    #5
  6. paof6

    James Sweet Guest

    Which is stupid IMO, I'm all for clean running cars, but if the sniffer says
    it's good, what excuse do they have for failing it?
     
    James Sweet, May 4, 2008
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.