Are they really this cheap to buy?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by uw_moving, Apr 17, 2008.

  1. uw_moving

    uw_moving Guest

    uw_moving, Apr 17, 2008
    #1
  2. uw_moving

    James Sweet Guest


    There's been discussion about this in the past. Used cars lose value
    ludicrously quickly over there, which makes me wonder why anyone would ever
    buy a new one. I recall a few years ago clean 240s were still fetching over
    $10K in the US, and Brits were scoffing at for sale posts from people in the
    US, many of which I considered to be bargains.

    Of course fuel is far more expensive there, a while back a friend of mine
    calculated it out to about $9 a gallon, which makes a 23 mpg Volvo a bit
    less appealing I suppose.
     
    James Sweet, Apr 17, 2008
    #2
  3. seems to me now is a great time to be shopping used volvos...there
    are many, low miles...xlt shpe units out there...esp in the us
    market...
    just be sure to have them checked out by someone who knows volvos
    b4 any purchase......i am pining for one of the v70r wagons i keep
    coming across.....03-06's for 13-19k us ... aprox 50% of sticker.....

    cheers.....
     
    ~^ beancounter ~^, Apr 19, 2008
    #3
  4. uw_moving

    Steve H Guest

    I paid 240.00 GBP for a very tidy 1991 960 Turbo last year, only 125,000
    miles. It's now done 138,000 miles and going strong, the main reason
    for the low price is fuel costs, we are paying $10.00 a gallon!!

    Steve H
     
    Steve H, Apr 19, 2008
    #4
  5. uw_moving

    James Sweet Guest


    960 Turbo? I've seen a few custom made with a turbo slapped on the big
    straight 6, but I didn't think Volvo built any like that?

    Good thing stuff isn't as spread out there as it is here with fuel costs
    like that.
     
    James Sweet, Apr 19, 2008
    #5
  6. uw_moving

    Gary Heston Guest

    If they were LHD, you could do well buying them in Britian and shipping
    them to the US. I suppose the drive train and a lot of other parts would
    be interchangeable; selling them here as parts cars could also be profitable.


    Gary
     
    Gary Heston, Apr 19, 2008
    #6
  7. uw_moving

    Steve H Guest

    They made a few in 1991 using the red block engine from the 940 with
    more turbo boost, it's as quick as a straight 6 but the insurance is
    cheaper. I think they only sold a few in the UK and dropped the turbo
    as an option in late 1991. Petrol went up another 2p today;c(

    Steve H
     
    Steve H, Apr 19, 2008
    #7
  8. uw_moving

    James Sweet Guest

    Ah, that insurance per engine displacement has created some interesting
    motors. Over here the engine can be as big as you want and it doesn't really
    affect the insurance. There's some flags that put you in a high risk
    category but I think Volvos in general are pretty well under the radar.


    I kinda wish they'd never mucked up the numbering scheme, the 760 Turbo and
    now apparently the 960 Turbo are both misnomers.
     
    James Sweet, Apr 19, 2008
    #8
  9. uw_moving

    Tony Guest

    Why would they rust? They are galvanised.

    I disagree with the others, the reason for the low price is not fuel
    costs, plenty of new SUV owners used to own a 940 and do less mpg now.
    Fuel cost is really only now starting to sway purchasing, even then I'm
    not sure, I mostly work at home these days. LPTs tend to return a good
    30mpg.

    The real reason is fashion. They are still identifiable as an old car
    due to the design (not rust). Old cars mostly don't last as long here
    due to rust, small engine design and short driving distances. Also the
    fact that in GB the number plates have a year letter has created number
    plate snobbery. Combined effect is people here are used to changing
    their cars much earlier than in the US with its better weather, bigger
    engines and rugged designs. Mention a car more than 5 years old and
    most people will shy away remembering their first Mondeo, Escort or
    Astra, Volvo's reputation doesn't extend that far for those people.

    Old 240s/940s really stand out here amongst older cars, they nearly all
    have good body work and good paint too (still shiny and well coloured),
    and of course reliable, everything still working usually. A good 16
    year old 940 will overtake (in condition) a typical 5 year old Ford, and
    IMO a 10 year old 850. The Fords and Vauxhalls (GM?) here are really
    not built to last.

    The only people that want older Volvos are the poor and the well
    informed / enthusiasts. Although I still see specials ed 97 ones in
    ebay dealers for GBP3,500. (I paid GBP4,000 for my 1995 SE Turbo 8
    years ago).
     
    Tony, Apr 21, 2008
    #9
  10. uw_moving

    James Sweet Guest


    Galvanized bodies will still rust in areas where they salt the roads, it
    just delays the inevitable. This summer I need to replace a section of the
    floor pan in my mom's '86 245, it spent a few years up in Alaska around a
    decade ago and the salt took its toll. Fortunately nothing structural
    rusted.
     
    James Sweet, Apr 21, 2008
    #10
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.