Automatic Shifter On The Column?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Stephen Palkwoetz, Nov 22, 2004.

  1. My dear old Mom needs to replace her 83 K-car. The early/mid 1990
    Volvo's look to be about the same size and shape of her K-car. Need
    to know if Volvo's offered a column mounted automatic transmission
    shifter in any of the 1990 to 1996 models. If so, what models? A
    quick check on E-bay shows only floor mounted shifters.

    Don't know that much about Volvo's other than they are a quality car.
    Can any of the experts here help me out.

    Thank you.
     
    Stephen Palkwoetz, Nov 22, 2004
    #1
  2. Stephen Palkwoetz

    Rob Guenther Guest

    No they didn't.... Column shifters seem to be pretty much an American car
    thing.

    I'm pretty sure your mother could figure out a floor mounted shifter, I find
    them much more user friendly then column shifters... Tho she might engage
    the wipers a few dozen times the first month while trying to back out of the
    driveway.
     
    Rob Guenther, Nov 22, 2004
    #2
  3. Stephen Palkwoetz

    Bev A. Kupf Guest

    Actually, several English cars from the '40s and '50s still had
    column shifters (for manual transmissions). Also, some Italian
    Fiats in the '50s and '60s had column shifters, also for manual
    transmissions. We still had these in Rhodesia in early '70s.

    Then there was the French 2CV -- that had a weird dash mounted
    shifter, but by Jim -- that car had a simple engine to work on!

    Beverly
     
    Bev A. Kupf, Nov 22, 2004
    #3
  4. Indeed so, in fact right up into the 60s and later. And not just for
    manual transmissions, but autos too. Not sure what the latest
    generation of Rolls Royce have, but they always seemed to favour the
    column shifter.

    I could never really see the point of a column shift, particularly
    with a manual gearbox. The few occasions I've driven one, I certainly
    never found them easier to use, and the linkage must have been a
    bugger to design, especially accounting for differences in LHD and
    RHD.
    The Renault 4, et al, were like that, too. IIRC it was because the
    gearbox was mounted in front of the engine.
    --

    Stewart Hargrave


    For email, replace 'SpamOnlyToHere' with my name
     
    Stewart Hargrave, Nov 22, 2004
    #4
  5. Stephen Palkwoetz

    Seppburgh2 Guest

    A 3 speed manual on the column were a hoot to drive. Back in my high-school
    days (71-75) a buddy had a 55 Ford with one we go whooping down dirt roads on.
    Then a girlfriend had a Ford Falcon with it and a 289 V-8. That car flew, hid
    second gear and give it gas.

    Any way, thanks for getting back to me on this. Will keep looking for her.

    Thanks.
     
    Seppburgh2, Nov 22, 2004
    #5
  6. Stephen Palkwoetz

    jdunville Guest

    With tongue in cheek, 60's 120 series Volvo's with automatics did have
    the gear shift on the steering coulmn.

    Joe
     
    jdunville, Nov 22, 2004
    #6
  7. Stephen Palkwoetz

    Chip C Guest

    The obvious advantage, at least in larger vehicles, is that it allows
    more comfortable three-abreast seating on bench seats.

    Chip C
     
    Chip C, Nov 22, 2004
    #7
  8. My father's 1966 Ford Corsair had a column shift and a bench seat in the
    front. I could take my girl out sitting thigh to thigh - nearly as good as
    a fumble.
     
    Geoff Pearson, Nov 22, 2004
    #8
  9. Stephen Palkwoetz

    James Sweet Guest


    Never really thought of that, though as complex as the linkage must have
    been, that was one of the few things that *didn't* ever break on my friend's
    Ford.
     
    James Sweet, Nov 22, 2004
    #9
  10. My guess is that it was to make room for a center passenger in front.

    Mike
     
    Michael Pardee, Nov 22, 2004
    #10
  11. Yep; as others have mentioned, too. Thinking about it, all the column
    shift cars I have know in the UK had bench seats at the front, so
    theoretically three people could sit in the front. Much easier in the
    US, where the cars are at least five times as wide as our modest ones.

    Either that, or it seems they were intended for two people to sit
    close enough for thigh contact. But I had a sheltered upbringing, and
    think that would make gear selection very difficult to concentrate on,
    wherever the lever was.
    --

    Stewart Hargrave


    For email, replace 'SpamOnlyToHere' with my name
     
    Stewart Hargrave, Nov 23, 2004
    #11
  12. Stewart, you are such an exaggerator! UK cars are about 200 cm wide, US cars
    are about 200 inches wide. Just about the same, really!

    Mike
     
    Michael Pardee, Nov 23, 2004
    #12
  13. I would never exaggerate anything in a million years.

    Actually, browsing through the conversion menus of Calc98, there seem
    to be several things where the same unit represents different
    quantities in the US and UK. Not just the gallon, but nautical miles,
    therms, drams, firkins and shipping tons, to name some. Plus, of
    course, the standard unit of car width.
    --

    Stewart Hargrave


    For email, replace 'SpamOnlyToHere' with my name
     
    Stewart Hargrave, Nov 24, 2004
    #13
  14. Stephen Palkwoetz

    blurp Guest

    Sorry, can I get that number in furlongs per fortnight?

    blurp
     
    blurp, Nov 24, 2004
    #14
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.