Can a fuel pre-heater improve MPG?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by geronimo, Jun 17, 2008.

  1. geronimo

    geronimo Guest

    I saw an article on internet saying that if one adds a fuel pre-heater
    on the fuel line ahead of the fuel rail, it improves mileage by
    increasing the combustion efficiency. Its easy to do on my 740 or
    nearly any car, you could just bend a long piece of copper tubing into
    a U-shape, silver- solder brass barb fittings on the ends, and re-rout
    the fuel line through it. The pre-heater assy is mounted against the
    radiator. It makes sense that hot fuel would burn better than cold
    fuel being injectd into the cylinders, but whether it would make any
    real appreciable diference on my 82 740 turbo or not...I don't know.
    Could it possibly induce a vapor -lock when restarting the engine when
    still hot?
     
    geronimo, Jun 17, 2008
    #1
  2. geronimo

    James Sweet Guest


    There's all kinds of snake oil claiming to increase fuel economy. In
    practice this won't do anything for you, the fuel injectors spray a fine
    mist of atomized fuel and this hits the back of the hot intake valves
    which further vaporizes it. Heating the fuel will do little more than
    promoting vapor lock, as well as the hotter less dense fuel will alter
    the flow rate of the injectors and increase vapor loss as the hot fuel
    is returned to the tank through the return line. Manufactures actually
    take steps to *reduce* the heating of fuel, hence the use of return-less
    injection systems in some cars.

    In a nutshell, don't screw with the fuel system. LH-Jetronic is already
    very good, any "improvements" are just as likely to make things worse.

    Keep up on maintenance, increase tire pressure, run synthetic fluids,
    remove excess cargo, drive with a lighter foot, these all have very real
    and measurable effects on fuel economy without doing any goofy
    modifications. A Volvo turbo with an automatic transmission is just not
    particularly fuel efficient.
     
    James Sweet, Jun 17, 2008
    #2
  3. geronimo

    Andy Guest

    :
    : geronimo wrote:
    : >
    : > I saw an article on internet saying that if one adds a fuel pre-heater
    : > on the fuel line ahead of the fuel rail, it improves mileage by
    : > increasing the combustion efficiency. Its easy to do on my 740 or
    : > nearly any car, you could just bend a long piece of copper tubing into
    : > a U-shape, silver- solder brass barb fittings on the ends, and re-rout
    : > the fuel line through it. The pre-heater assy is mounted against the
    : > radiator. It makes sense that hot fuel would burn better than cold
    : > fuel being injectd into the cylinders, but whether it would make any
    : > real appreciable diference on my 82 740 turbo or not...I don't know.
    : > Could it possibly induce a vapor -lock when restarting the engine when
    : > still hot?
    :
    :
    : There's all kinds of snake oil claiming to increase fuel economy. In
    : practice this won't do anything for you, the fuel injectors spray a fine
    : mist of atomized fuel and this hits the back of the hot intake valves
    : which further vaporizes it. Heating the fuel will do little more than
    : promoting vapor lock, as well as the hotter less dense fuel will alter
    : the flow rate of the injectors and increase vapor loss as the hot fuel
    : is returned to the tank through the return line. Manufactures actually
    : take steps to *reduce* the heating of fuel, hence the use of return-less
    : injection systems in some cars.
    :
    : In a nutshell, don't screw with the fuel system. LH-Jetronic is already
    : very good, any "improvements" are just as likely to make things worse.
    :
    : Keep up on maintenance, increase tire pressure, run synthetic fluids,
    : remove excess cargo, drive with a lighter foot, these all have very real
    : and measurable effects on fuel economy without doing any goofy
    : modifications. A Volvo turbo with an automatic transmission is just not
    : particularly fuel efficient.

    This idea took me back a few years to the time in the UK when I was the
    proud owner of a 1949 Jowet Bradford. A precursor of the minivan I suppose.
    After all it WAS a converted van, with seats and windows, all driven by a
    horizontally opposed ("boxer"-type") flat-twin of an astounding 1005
    cc........
    The thing is the inlet manifold was in the form of an arch rising from each
    of the two H.O. cylinders. Surrounding the manifold was an outer water
    jacket.
    On top of the arch was mounted the carburetor. The whole thing was in the
    form of a beautiful aluminum casting.

    The result: The atomized fuel and air mixture headed down the two arms of
    the manifold arch towards the cylinders, heated by the coolant rising from
    the cylinders, which then continued from the top of the arch forward to the
    top of the radiator This was different from heating the liquid fuel.
    Incredibly there was no water pump. The Owner's Manual offered one "for use
    in the tropics........"

    It seems to contradict the theory behind intercoolers for turbos, but worked
    very well. It always started easily in all weathers, never experienced
    vapor lock and reliably transported the family from N.E. Scotland to the
    South coast of England on several occasions, as well as being a "daily
    driver".

    Andy I.
     
    Andy, Jun 18, 2008
    #3
  4. geronimo

    James Sweet Guest


    Well the difference there is that an intercooler is not to improve
    efficiency or help vaporize fuel, but to cool the charge air to prevent
    detonation. After being compressed by the turbocharger, the air can be
    very hot, and it's just air, not a fuel/air mixture.
     
    James Sweet, Jun 18, 2008
    #4
  5. geronimo

    Andy Guest

    :
    :
    : >
    : > It seems to contradict the theory behind intercoolers for turbos, but
    worked
    : > very well. It always started easily in all weathers, never experienced
    : > vapor lock and reliably transported the family from N.E. Scotland to the
    : > South coast of England on several occasions, as well as being a "daily
    : > driver".
    : >
    : > Andy I.
    : >
    : >
    : >
    :
    :
    : Well the difference there is that an intercooler is not to improve
    : efficiency or help vaporize fuel, but to cool the charge air to prevent
    : detonation. After being compressed by the turbocharger, the air can be
    : very hot, and it's just air, not a fuel/air mixture.

    I understand that, James, but doesn't the intercooler also make the
    compressed air even more dense, whereas "my" hotwater jacket would expand
    the air making it less dense and so reduce the charge?

    Just curious.
    Andy I.
     
    Andy, Jun 18, 2008
    #5
  6. geronimo

    Maarten Deen Guest

    I always have to laugh when I read "tricks" like this. Wouldn't you
    think that every car manufacturer would have implemented a fuel
    pre-heater if this was improving fuel efficiency?

    Let it be known that I also do not believe the consipracy stories
    that car manufacturers deliberatly make their cars less fuel
    efficient for the benefit of petrol companies.


    BTW: my car does have a carburettor heater. That is: the carburettor has
    a line to the cooling fluid. Keeps from freezing in the winter.

    Maarten
    Maarten
     
    Maarten Deen, Jun 18, 2008
    #6
  7. geronimo

    Roadie Guest

    My first questions are who was the author on the internet, what are
    his credentials as an automotive expert, has this result been
    duplicated and what is the effect on mpg. My guess is that IF there
    is a positive effect it is small.

    If you want to increase MPG and reduce total fuel cost the following
    are proven tricks:
    1. Combine trips and make a conscious decision to drive less.
    2. When driving keep the rpms down by upshifting as soon as
    possible.
    3. When driving hold a steady speed at ot below the speed limit and
    use engine braking wherever possible.
    4. Practice holding the gas pedal as steady as possible. Most
    drivers are on and off the pedal a lot more than they are aware and
    that eats a lot of gas.
    5. Keep the car in tune and maintain tire pressure higher than the
    minimum. 35 psi seems to work for a lot of cars.
    6. Remove all the excess stuff that seems to accumulate in our cars.
    Don't carry a tool box or roof rack unless needed for that trip.
    6. If you car has an average and instant mpg displays, use them. The
    instant mpg is a great tool for seeing the impact of driving behaviour
    on mpg. If not see if an aftermarket gauge can be plugged into the
    OBD port.
     
    Roadie, Jun 18, 2008
    #7
  8. In <CwT5k.74863$bs3.42174@trnddc07>,
    These are good suggestions. With 100% of my driving done in stop-and-go
    traffic in a city with really bad roads (New Orleans), I was averaging
    about 19 mpg in my S60 (2005 2.5T). Changing the air-filter to a K&N,
    and keeping the tires properly inflated (35 psi), improved my fuel
    efficiency to a steady 20 mpg. Driving with a much lighter foot gives
    me almost 22 (average for the last three tankfuls is 21.7).

    AC
     
    Aawara Chowdhury, Jun 18, 2008
    #8
  9. geronimo

    James Sweet Guest


    Yes, the intercooler will make the air more dense, which allows more
    air, and subsequently more fuel to be burned, producing more power.

    A hot mixture will reduce horsepower, but heated runners may help to
    prevent fuel vapor from condensing on the inside wall of the intake
    runners on a carbureted engine. There is no benefit to heating the
    intake runners on an injected engine, it will only reduce the power.
     
    James Sweet, Jun 19, 2008
    #9
  10. geronimo

    Andy Guest

    :
    :
    : >
    : > I understand that, James, but doesn't the intercooler also make the
    : > compressed air even more dense, whereas "my" hotwater jacket would
    expand
    : > the air making it less dense and so reduce the charge?
    : >
    : > Just curious.
    : > Andy I.
    : >
    : >
    :
    :
    : Yes, the intercooler will make the air more dense, which allows more
    : air, and subsequently more fuel to be burned, producing more power.
    :
    : A hot mixture will reduce horsepower, but heated runners may help to
    : prevent fuel vapor from condensing on the inside wall of the intake
    : runners on a carbureted engine. There is no benefit to heating the
    : intake runners on an injected engine, it will only reduce the power.

    Thanks James. I feel that the old Jowet Bradford system has been
    vindicated!

    Andy I.
     
    Andy, Jun 19, 2008
    #10
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.