Cool looking new S40

Discussion in 'Volvo S40' started by squirrely, Jun 4, 2004.

  1. squirrely

    squirrely Guest

    anyone else think this vehicle is a step up styling wise?

    very sporty, maybe vaguely Beemerish in a Volvo sort of way, perhaps the
    wheel placement.

    also appears to be more spacious. Definitely smaller than my s70, but my
    impression is that it feels bigger than the 60, or about the same. Should
    update the 60 along the same lines in my opinion

    Too bad manual stick not an option. My guess would be that w the regular 2.3
    5cyl, this thing hops
     
    squirrely, Jun 4, 2004
    #1
  2. squirrely

    Jack G Guest

    Check out the review in the July issue of R&T...

    Jack
     
    Jack G, Jun 4, 2004
    #2
  3. squirrely

    Mr. Slow Guest

    Snip *(enough room, but not enough to
    spread out... just enough to sit)*

    Just like a V70, then. :)
     
    Mr. Slow, Jun 4, 2004
    #3
  4. squirrely

    Rob Guenther Guest

    It's smaller in the back then an S60, at least it feels like that to me.
    Reminds me of sitting in the back of a Jetta (enough room, but not enough to
    spread out... just enough to sit)
     
    Rob Guenther, Jun 5, 2004
    #4
  5. squirrely

    squirrely Guest

    Suppose ur right about back seat, and sounds like you own a S60, so u should
    know

    Have to check out the R&T article

    I don't know what it is, but last years S40 just left me cold, and this one
    seems to have more room, and more style, and my guess is that even with
    normally aspirated 5cyl, it should move nicely. I have the same engine in my
    S70, and torque is pretty lame till you hit 3000rpms. Should hit that sweet
    spot a whole lot quicker in this lighter vehicle.
     
    squirrely, Jun 5, 2004
    #5
  6. squirrely

    squirrely Guest

    thanks, cked out the online version, seem to agree w my outlook. That
    tighter look is better than the 60 in my book

    says manual is a possibility - cool, the literature I saw didn't seem to
    mention as option, but maybe that was just an edmunds configure deal.
     
    squirrely, Jun 5, 2004
    #6
  7. I don't. I think it is an evolutionary step. I think the back end looks
    truncated and almost like a hatchback. I like the balance of the s80 and
    s60 better. Actually, I like the newest v70.
    s60 needs better rear room. To me there's no comparison on the inside.
    New s40 feels like entry level Volvo, s60 feels like premium car.


    Ben
     
    Benjamin Smith, Jun 5, 2004
    #7
  8. squirrely

    Neoisthe1 Guest

    Too bad manual stick not an option. My guess would be that w the regular 2.3
    I drove the 2004.5 S40 T5 the other day.
    This thing is fast and pulls like a bat out of hell. Corners on rails and
    brakes are good. The only thing I didn't like was the steering - little
    feedback and not as tight as a BMW. I also drove the BMW 325, 330, and Audi
    4, 3.0. The little S40 T5 feels faster than them all and is a bargain in
    comparison !!!! Can't wait for the R version ;-)
     
    Neoisthe1, Jun 6, 2004
    #8
  9. squirrely

    Rob Guenther Guest

    No, we have a 960... But i've sat in every Volvo they currently make, with
    the front seat adjusted for my 6' frame, and I squeaze into the back... The
    V70 is a massive car for this, far more room then the 960... The S60 isn't
    too bad at all, the S40 is a little tight, very Mark-4 (99-2004 style
    Golf/Jetta) VW feel to the back seat.

    I am a firm believer in that most people have been spoiled by riding in
    large, American highway cruising cars with 35 inches of legroom... I'm from
    a German family, so only German, and Swedish cars are allowed... Our Volvo
    is a massive car compared to our VW's (and everything bigger then the Volvo
    is a boat of a car;-) ).

    I bought the R&T for that article... They loved the car, if I had $33000+ to
    spend, I think I would invest in one (maybe a V50 tho)... Too bad I can
    afford, maybe $25000 to spend on a new car.... There is nothing I want in
    this price range, other then the VW Jetta.
     
    Rob Guenther, Jun 7, 2004
    #9
  10. squirrely

    Rob Guenther Guest

    V70's are huge... you can fit 3 adults back there - more room then my 960.
     
    Rob Guenther, Jun 7, 2004
    #10
  11. squirrely

    squirrely Guest

    yep, have a Cross Country V70 type too, S70 about the same deal, except
    without the wagon storage area.

    thinking s40 may be all I need in the future though
     
    squirrely, Jun 8, 2004
    #11
  12. squirrely

    squirrely Guest

    ditto on the price Rob

    no hurry now, 70 has plenty of life, sturdy and still clean, but

    may be tempted in the future when a 2004 s40 hits used market

    V50, is that turbo designation?
     
    squirrely, Jun 8, 2004
    #12
  13. squirrely

    squirrely Guest

    cripes, bat out of hell, and u want more power, yikes

    never going to get the steering feel of a RWD vehicle in a FWD, but if it
    corners on rails . . . .

    never going to get the snow traction of a FWD drive vehicle in a RWD BMW
    either.

    I'm thinking that based on your observation, it's possible to get 90% of the
    sportiness of a BMW with the all season, no snow tire drivability of the FWD
    vehicles I have been spoiled by. Besides, already own a RWD roadster for
    those top down spring/summer/fall days.

    cheers
     
    squirrely, Jun 8, 2004
    #13
  14. squirrely

    Rob Guenther Guest

    V50 is just what they are calling the wagon... like S60/V70 I guess?

    The V50 will have, apparantly the same engines as the S40 (the NA and
    Turbo'ed 5 cylinder)
     
    Rob Guenther, Jun 9, 2004
    #14
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.