Did Jiffy Lube Kill my 240 Tranny?

Discussion in 'Volvo 240' started by naverillsn001, Apr 11, 2005.

  1. I have a 1984 240 DL automatic with 190,000. The tranny has always shifted
    smoothly, except for not going into reverse when hot.

    Jiffy Lube flushed and replaced the fluid the other day... A few miles
    after leaving JL, the tranny started shuddering... Soon it barely worked
    at all, running for a few hundred feet and then disengaging.. I discovered
    it was overfull... I siphoned off the excess, but still no go. Had it towed
    to a trans guy... $1700 rebuild underway (including adding an aftermarket
    cooler).

    SO... Should I bitch at Jiffy Lube, or should I accept that on a tranny
    this old there was a high likelihood that changing the fluid would screw
    it up, and it's not their fault?
     
    naverillsn001, Apr 11, 2005
    #1
  2. Given that it was overfilled - which is a dimbulb thing to do and
    indicates that the tech didn't quite understand how to properly fill an
    automatic transmission - I might question whether they got the right type
    of fluid in it. What type is recommended? I've had arguments with Jiffy
    Lube types about topping up my Odyssey's transmission - they just INSIST
    that their generic stuff is fine, while (1) Odysseys have a known history
    of tranny failures for mysterious reasons, possibly related to improper
    fluid; and (2) Honda very sternly recommends only Hondamatic fluid, no
    substitutes.

    Most quick-lube places are staffed by idiots who go through generic moves
    on every vehicle, no matter what continent or era it comes from. So yeah,
    I'd suspect that JiffyLube putzed something. Did your tranny guy give you
    any feedback on the fluid or the condition of the tranny?

    On the other hand - even Volvos wear out, and 190k ain't young. If you'd
    been having troubles with it, even trivial ones, it could well be that
    even a proper flushing and fluid change would have snapped the threads
    holding your band and clutch linings on.

    Unless you can prove the wrong fluid was put in, and even then I'd say
    that 190k would trump any such claim, you're not likely to get any
    acknowledgement or compensation from JL.
     
    James Gifford, Apr 11, 2005
    #2
  3. naverillsn001

    Andy Mann Guest

    GO AFTER THEM IT HAS TO BE WORTH A TRY.

     
    Andy Mann, Apr 11, 2005
    #3
  4. naverillsn001

    Clay Guest

    do a little research.
    You might find (some of) the manufacturers of the equipment used for flushing
    trannies, etc. recommend NOT to flush "high mileage" vehicles.
    In which case, you would have an argument that the equipment wasn't used per
    the manufacturers instructions.
    ymmv...
     
    Clay, Apr 11, 2005
    #4
  5. They killed my wife's '91 Toyota Celica - 195k on the engine, did an oil
    change, and they didn't put the cap back on... While they never admitted
    guilt, they did replace the engine (which doesn't legally admit guilt, but
    sure looks like it from my position!).

    So I'd approach them on it. Take it up the line quickly - don't mess with
    the shop manager for too long. The guy who fixing it can be a good resource
    on this, too. We had the Celica looked at, and the guy was very convinced
    they hadn't screwed the cap back on. For the actual engine replacement,
    they wanted to use the shop of their choice (who looked like they did a good
    25% of their business on Jiffy Lube "mistakes"), but I was able to check
    them out independently, and was comfortable with them.

    And no, I haven't been back since. I wouldn't stop there to use the
    restroom, from the way they acted through the process. But we did get the
    engine replaced.
     
    Nick Cassimatis, Apr 11, 2005
    #5
  6. I should add that I've never had any trouble with engine service, but the
    idiots at a JL did once putz up my tire pressures something unbelievable.
    Van drove funny on the way home, so I checked: 44, 31, 41 and 48 psi. They
    had been within a smidge of 35 each when I went in. Had I driven very long
    at freeway speeds, either of those two high ones could have blown; the
    differential made the van very wobbly and unstable as well, even on the
    surface streets I drove home.

    I've never figured that one out. I've also never been back. There's an indy
    shop nearby for oil and an indy Honda shop for more advanced stuff, both of
    whom I trust.
     
    James Gifford, Apr 11, 2005
    #6
  7. Is that a ZF transmission, the type with PN123D shifting, or an AW with the
    PRN12D and separate overdrive? The ZF is known to be very intolerant of
    revving in neutral - IIRC 2000 rpm for 30 seconds is the limit. If it's a ZF
    and they were revving it anytime during the fluid change they probably
    burned up the tranny.

    Mike
     
    Michael Pardee, Apr 12, 2005
    #7
  8. naverillsn001

    James Sweet Guest


    I would say it's highly likely they put the wrong fluid in it, it's
    confusing enough for even mechanically inclined people as Volvo changed
    fluid types at some point in the early 80's, haven't kept up on the slushbox
    specs since I no longer have to deal with any of them but if they put the
    wrong fluid in it very well could have killed it. I'd definitly go after
    them since it was working fine before that, you might have to have the
    tranny shop open it up and determine the cause of failure though.
     
    James Sweet, Apr 12, 2005
    #8
  9. naverillsn001

    James Sweet Guest

    No it's not a ZF, they were never used in 240s, at least not in north
    america.
     
    James Sweet, Apr 12, 2005
    #9
  10. naverillsn001

    jg Guest

    I'd worry about the 48 pound one but even more if it was under inflated by
    the same amount. You'd have to worry about a place called Jiffylube though.
     
    jg, Apr 12, 2005
    #10
  11. naverillsn001

    wrench_head Guest

    Go after them. They are responsible, no matter what the lube jockeys tell
    you, to some degree. Having an invoice and then catastrophic failure right
    afterwards is great evidence. If you can't afford/get a lawyer, at least see
    a para-legal (known good one). Most are affiliated with a lawyer if they do
    not practice right in a lawyer's building.
    Keep in mind what the "legalise" says on any companies statement/invoice
    means squat if it is contrary to your state's legal rights in place. GET A
    LEGAL OPINION !!

    Cheers,
     
    wrench_head, Apr 12, 2005
    #11
  12. naverillsn001

    jg Guest

    I agree. Another of those instances where knowledge of what else might have
    gone wrong can be an impediment.
     
    jg, Apr 13, 2005
    #12
  13. naverillsn001

    Guest Guest

    a trans service @ 190 k miles is not really recommended due to old fluid
    properties and new fluid properties ..new transmission fluid is highly
    cleansing and can actually cause a failure if trans has already exhibited
    problems.... not jiffylubes fault just old trans.ASE certified transmission
    tech...dont buy a new computer for your car repair yours ask me for info
     
    Guest, Apr 17, 2005
    #13
  14. naverillsn001

    John Horner Guest

    Why oh Why people go to those places is a mystery to me.

    Probably the transmission was on it's way out anyway, 190k on one of those
    is certainly within the normal expected failure range, especially for a 20
    year old car.

    Automatic flushes are not a good idea on high mileage transmissions. Often
    they bust loose deposits which would be better left alone.

    I doubt you will get anywhere bitching at JL.

    John
     
    John Horner, Apr 26, 2005
    #14
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.