Emission test WITH and WITHOUT a catalytic converter - for your reading pleasure...

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Someone, Mar 8, 2009.

  1. Someone

    Someone Guest

    The 90 240 I bought had a defective CAT and failed the emission test.
    So I told the garage to empty the CAT. I wanted to see what kind of
    number you get without a CAT. I then had a brand new CAT installed,
    drove ~ 100K miles and then took the test again. Below are the
    numbers I got:

    With an empty CAT:

    At 40km/h (24mph) Curb idle test

    HC ppm 134 107
    CO % 0.86 0.85
    NO ppm 2753 N/A

    With a brand new CAT:

    HC ppm 46 24
    CO% 0.09 0.00
    NO ppm 94 N/A
     
    Someone, Mar 8, 2009
    #1
  2. Someone

    Someone Guest


    SMALL TYPO: it is ~100 mile and NOT ~100K miles... duh...
     
    Someone, Mar 8, 2009
    #2
  3. Someone

    Radioguy Guest

    And your point is that the car pollutes less with a catalytic
    converter installed than without one? Hope you didn't pay extra for
    this information.
     
    Radioguy, Mar 9, 2009
    #3
  4. Someone

    James Sweet Guest


    I thought the data was interesting. Of course it pollutes less, but it's
    interesting to see some quantities. The difference on that car is much
    smaller than I've seen on some cars, the 240 would still pass the
    emissions inspection here without a cat, many cars wouldn't. With one
    it's very clean.
     
    James Sweet, Mar 9, 2009
    #4
  5. Someone

    Andy Guest

    Thanks for taking the trouble to do the comparison.
    It's interesting to see the actual numbers.

    Andy I.


    : The 90 240 I bought had a defective CAT and failed the emission test.
    : So I told the garage to empty the CAT. I wanted to see what kind of
    : number you get without a CAT. I then had a brand new CAT installed,
    : drove ~ 100K miles and then took the test again. Below are the
    : numbers I got:
    :
    : With an empty CAT:
    :
    : At 40km/h (24mph) Curb idle test
    :
    : HC ppm 134 107
    : CO % 0.86 0.85
    : NO ppm 2753 N/A
    :
    : With a brand new CAT:
    :
    : HC ppm 46 24
    : CO% 0.09 0.00
    : NO ppm 94 N/A
     
    Andy, Mar 9, 2009
    #5
  6. Someone

    clay Guest

    I get where a cat helps unburnt hydrocarbons.
    Interesting it has such affect on carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides.
    My old 240 is always right on the edge for NO (better though, with the
    knock generator vacuum line plugged.)
    May be time for a new cat.
     
    clay, Mar 9, 2009
    #6
  7. Someone

    James Sweet Guest


    CO is just partially burned hydrocarbons, so it's no surprise there. 3
    way converters are specifically designed to reduce nitrogen oxides as well.
     
    James Sweet, Mar 9, 2009
    #7
  8. Someone

    clay Guest

    I put a cat on it six or eight years ago. I'll bet those bastids put a
    single speed one on it instead of the 3 way...
     
    clay, Mar 9, 2009
    #8
  9. Very interesting ,here we can drive forever with no tests unless we hoon
    around .Many knock the inards out of the converter for more power as theres
    no risk of being caught .I did this for one day while I purchased a new
    converter and it seemed to run better ,more power but I replaced it the next
    day with a converter .
     
    Jon Robertson, Apr 9, 2009
    #9
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.