Ford Is Selling Volvo !!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steve
  • Start date Start date
I am surprised at many of you. For Volvo enthusiasts, your knowledge of Volvo and the Volvo/Ford relationship is very inaccurate. The S80 was designed by volvo engineers/designers almost ten years ago. The marriage with Ford brough Volvo the capital to develop the S80. Therefore any derivative thereof has been all-volvo. Like the S60. This is no more ford than an aston martin.

It saddens me to think that you all believe Volvo has gone in the wrong direction with their design. But what do you think die-hard owners of the 200 series were thinking when the 700 series came out. Or the 800 series. Or even a five cylinder engine! Volvo's are no less safe and no less durable than they were twenty years ago. You ahve to drive a volvo long enough to find that out. And just because one component breaks doesn't mean the whole thing is terrible.

Additionally, the only thing shared between the new S40 and the Ford Focus is the chassis. Let's learn the basics people.

Also, you might think the 850 was the first volvo with front wheel drive. You're wrong. the 400 series was front wheel drive in the 80's. Having a transverse engine also gives a car's frame more give in an accident, and provides a barrier for a collision, without throwing the engine through the firewall.

With the exception of Jaguar, the PAG has been really autonomous in their workings. And the S40 is finally more a volvo than a japanese car. Don't like the styling? Buy a used 740. This is where volvo is going, and frankly, I like it (and I drove a 740 for 14 years).
 
I am surprised at many of you. For Volvo enthusiasts, your knowledge of Volvo and the Volvo/Ford relationship is very inaccurate. The S80 was designed by volvo engineers/designers almost ten years ago. The marriage with Ford brough Volvo the capital to develop the S80. Therefore any derivative thereof has been all-volvo. Like the S60. This is no more ford than an aston martin.

It saddens me to think that you all believe Volvo has gone in the wrong direction with their design. But what do you think die-hard owners of the 200 series were thinking when the 700 series came out. Or the 800 series. Or even a five cylinder engine! Volvo's are no less safe and no less durable than they were twenty years ago. You ahve to drive a volvo long enough to find that out. And just because one component breaks doesn't mean the whole thing is terrible.

Additionally, the only thing shared between the new S40 and the Ford Focus is the chassis. Let's learn the basics people.

Also, you might think the 850 was the first volvo with front wheel drive. You're wrong. the 400 series was front wheel drive in the 80's. Having a transverse engine also gives a car's frame more give in an accident, and provides a barrier for a collision, without throwing the engine through the firewall.

With the exception of Jaguar, the PAG has been really autonomous in their workings. And the S40 is finally more a volvo than a japanese car. Don't like the styling? Buy a used 740. This is where volvo is going, and frankly, I like it (and I drove a 740 for 14 years).
 
I am surprised at many of you. For Volvo enthusiasts, your knowledge of Volvo and the Volvo/Ford relationship is very inaccurate. The S80 was designed by volvo engineers/designers almost ten years ago. The marriage with Ford brough Volvo the capital to develop the S80. Therefore any derivative thereof has been all-volvo. Like the S60. This is no more ford than an aston martin.

It saddens me to think that you all believe Volvo has gone in the wrong direction with their design. But what do you think die-hard owners of the 200 series were thinking when the 700 series came out. Or the 800 series. Or even a five cylinder engine! Volvo's are no less safe and no less durable than they were twenty years ago. You ahve to drive a volvo long enough to find that out. And just because one component breaks doesn't mean the whole thing is terrible.

Additionally, the only thing shared between the new S40 and the Ford Focus is the chassis. Let's learn the basics people.

Also, you might think the 850 was the first volvo with front wheel drive. You're wrong. the 400 series was front wheel drive in the 80's. Having a transverse engine also gives a car's frame more give in an accident, and provides a barrier for a collision, without throwing the engine through the firewall.

With the exception of Jaguar, the PAG has been really autonomous in their workings. And the S40 is finally more a volvo than a japanese car. Don't like the styling? Buy a used 740. This is where volvo is going, and frankly, I like it (and I drove a 740 for 14 years).
 
I am surprised at many of you. For Volvo enthusiasts, your knowledge of Volvo and the Volvo/Ford relationship is very inaccurate. The S80 was designed by volvo engineers/designers almost ten years ago. The marriage with Ford brough Volvo the capital to develop the S80. Therefore any derivative thereof has been all-volvo. Like the S60. This is no more ford than an aston martin.

It saddens me to think that you all believe Volvo has gone in the wrong direction with their design. But what do you think die-hard owners of the 200 series were thinking when the 700 series came out. Or the 800 series. Or even a five cylinder engine! Volvo's are no less safe and no less durable than they were twenty years ago. You ahve to drive a volvo long enough to find that out. And just because one component breaks doesn't mean the whole thing is terrible.

Additionally, the only thing shared between the new S40 and the Ford Focus is the chassis. Let's learn the basics people.

Also, you might think the 850 was the first volvo with front wheel drive. You're wrong. the 400 series was front wheel drive in the 80's. Having a transverse engine also gives a car's frame more give in an accident, and provides a barrier for a collision, without throwing the engine through the firewall.

With the exception of Jaguar, the PAG has been really autonomous in their workings. And the S40 is finally more a volvo than a japanese car. Don't like the styling? Buy a used 740. This is where volvo is going, and frankly, I like it (and I drove a 740 for 14 years).
 
I am surprised at many of you. For Volvo enthusiasts, your knowledge of Volvo and the Volvo/Ford relationship is very inaccurate. The S80 was designed by volvo engineers/designers almost ten years ago. The marriage with Ford brough Volvo the capital to develop the S80. Therefore any derivative thereof has been all-volvo. Like the S60. This is no more ford than an aston martin.

It saddens me to think that you all believe Volvo has gone in the wrong direction with their design. But what do you think die-hard owners of the 200 series were thinking when the 700 series came out. Or the 800 series. Or even a five cylinder engine! Volvo's are no less safe and no less durable than they were twenty years ago. You ahve to drive a volvo long enough to find that out. And just because one component breaks doesn't mean the whole thing is terrible.

Additionally, the only thing shared between the new S40 and the Ford Focus is the chassis. Let's learn the basics people.

Also, you might think the 850 was the first volvo with front wheel drive. You're wrong. the 400 series was front wheel drive in the 80's. Having a transverse engine also gives a car's frame more give in an accident, and provides a barrier for a collision, without throwing the engine through the firewall.

With the exception of Jaguar, the PAG has been really autonomous in their workings. And the S40 is finally more a volvo than a japanese car. Don't like the styling? Buy a used 740. This is where volvo is going, and frankly, I like it (and I drove a 740 for 14 years).
 
Hooray! Finally somebody who reflects the truth and speaks with common sense
on this issue!!!

PC

| I am surprised at many of you. For Volvo enthusiasts, your knowledge of
Volvo and the Volvo/Ford relationship is very inaccurate. The S80 was
designed by volvo engineers/designers almost ten years ago. The marriage
with Ford brough Volvo the capital to develop the S80. Therefore any
derivative thereof has been all-volvo. Like the S60. This is no more ford
than an aston martin.
|
| It saddens me to think that you all believe Volvo has gone in the wrong
direction with their design. But what do you think die-hard owners of the
200 series were thinking when the 700 series came out. Or the 800 series.
Or even a five cylinder engine! Volvo's are no less safe and no less
durable than they were twenty years ago. You ahve to drive a volvo long
enough to find that out. And just because one component breaks doesn't mean
the whole thing is terrible.
|
| Additionally, the only thing shared between the new S40 and the Ford Focus
is the chassis. Let's learn the basics people.
|
| Also, you might think the 850 was the first volvo with front wheel drive.
You're wrong. the 400 series was front wheel drive in the 80's. Having a
transverse engine also gives a car's frame more give in an accident, and
provides a barrier for a collision, without throwing the engine through the
firewall.
|
| With the exception of Jaguar, the PAG has been really autonomous in their
workings. And the S40 is finally more a volvo than a japanese car. Don't
like the styling? Buy a used 740. This is where volvo is going, and
frankly, I like it (and I drove a 740 for 14 years).
|
 
Linkster82 said:
Additionally, the only thing shared between the new S40 and the Ford Focus is the chassis. Let's learn the basics people.
Click to expand...

This is not true. They have a lot of shared components (streering,
underbody, supension etc). The new Ford Focus, Mazda 3 and Volvo S40
are a joint developing project.

/Patrik
 
John Horner said:
Who exactly would buy Volvo's remaining car factories?
Click to expand...

Depends on the price. Factories in Euroupe where salaries are high
might be sold to a relocalisation company that guts the factory and
ships the equipment to India or Asia. Ford might do this themselves as
well, but I dont think so. They've got many production sites through
their accusitions, and they will probably be on the lookout to sell
when they think they'll get a fair price.

/Patrik
 
I am surprised at many of you.
Click to expand...

We are surprised and surprised and surprised and surprised and surprised
at you. You posted the same article 5 times.
Also, you might think the 850 was the first volvo with front wheel drive.
You're wrong. the 400 series was front wheel drive in the 80's. Having a
transverse engine also gives a car's frame more give in an accident, and
provides a barrier for a collision, without throwing the engine through the
firewall.
Click to expand...

The Volvo 480ES, introduced in 1986, was a front-drive hatchback. The
480 used a 1.7 Renault engine, and was built in the Netherlands at the
Volvo BV plant. Did the Born, Netherlands, group design the 850?????
 
But the DESIGN of the S60 still sucks big time!!! I know, I have one
and will soon get rid of it. My experience with the S60 may chase me
away from Volvo for good - too bad because we used to be very die-hard
and loyal. The direction Volvo is going is similar to so many of the
ricers - lots of fluff, very little substance.

Linkster82 said:
I am surprised at many of you. For Volvo enthusiasts, your knowledge of Volvo and the Volvo/Ford relationship is very inaccurate. The S80 was designed by volvo engineers/designers almost ten years ago. The marriage with Ford brough Volvo the capital to develop the S80. Therefore any derivative thereof has been all-volvo. Like the S60. This is no more ford than an aston martin.

It saddens me to think that you all believe Volvo has gone in the
Click to expand...
wrong direction with their design. But what do you think die-hard
owners of the 200 series were thinking when the 700 series came out.
Or the 800 series. Or even a five cylinder engine! Volvo's are no
less safe and no less durable than they were twenty years ago. You
ahve to drive a volvo long enough to find that out. And just because
one component breaks doesn't mean the whole thing is terrible.
 
I'm pretty sure the S40 won't use the same parts for brakes and suspension
as the Mazda, Volvo would most likely use parts more cost appropriate to a
30000 dollar car, not one from 1/2 its price range...
Click to expand...

Just like a Lincoln Town Car is built out of much better parts than is it's
half price cousin the Ford Crown Victoria ... oh yeah, the Town Car uses
almost all of the same mechanical parts as does the Crown Vic.

What make you think that Ford will do any better with the Mazda/Volvo
vehicle than it has with the Jaguar X-type?


John
 
John said:
Just like a Lincoln Town Car is built out of much better parts than is it's
half price cousin the Ford Crown Victoria ... oh yeah, the Town Car uses
almost all of the same mechanical parts as does the Crown Vic.

What make you think that Ford will do any better with the Mazda/Volvo
vehicle than it has with the Jaguar X-type?
Click to expand...

Exactly. Ford is the Microsoft of automakers. They make bland,
soulless, buggy implimentations of other people's ideas. It's
good enough for the rental fleets and that's all they really care
about.
 
John Horner said:
What make you think that Ford will do any better with the Mazda/Volvo
vehicle than it has with the Jaguar X-type?
Click to expand...

The Jaguar X-type is just a fancy Ford Contour. However it is quite
reliable. Much more reliable than the old Jags XJs.
 
Also to note, Fiat group SpA wanted to buy Volvo before Ford did.

The plan didn't go through, which is too bad, it would have saved Fiat.

Fiat group owns

Alfa Romeo
Maserati
Ferrari
Lancia

and a whole whack of other companies. Now Fiat is in trouble, and if Fiat had bought
Volvo at the time, most likely the cars would have been shared on Alfa Romeo platforms.

The Alfa Romeo 156 is proving to be a good car (although, sadly, we don't get Alfa or any
Fiat product other than Ferrari and Maserati in North America).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top