Ford Says It Isn't in Any Volvo Talks

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Captain Funn, May 30, 2007.

  1. Captain Funn

    Captain Funn Guest

    From The Wall Street Journal

    Growing Volvo Rumble Hits Ford
    Sale Talks Are Refuted,
    But Swedish Asset's Appeal
    Raises Questions Over Fate

    By JOHN D. STOLL
    May 30, 2007; Page A3

    DETROIT -- As Ford Motor Co. considers its options concerning its
    portfolio of assets, questions are growing over the fate of its Volvo unit.

    Ford said it isn't in talks with any party, including BMW AG, to sell
    Volvo, of Sweden. The company was responding to reports that the two
    auto makers had been in talks regarding the Volvo unit.
    [Getting Around]

    Earlier in 2007, BMW signaled interest in acquiring at least a stake in
    Volvo, according to people familiar with the German auto maker's
    situation. But these people said BMW interest has cooled.

    Ford spokesman John Gardiner dismissed suggestions that Volvo is on the
    block and said Ford has been the subject of heightened speculation over
    the past 12 months as it has sought ways to bolster its operations. The
    auto maker continues to hold weekly strategic-review meetings overseen
    by Chief Executive Alan Mulally.

    The Dearborn, Mich., auto maker maintains a consulting relationship with
    Kenneth Leet, a former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. investment banker who in
    December took a job with private-equity giant Cerberus Capital
    Management, which is gobbling up assets in the U.S. auto industry. Mr.
    Leet was hired last summer by Ford.

    The auto maker recently sold its Aston Martin unit to a consortium led
    by United Kingdom automotive veteran David Richards for $848 million.
    But Ford and Volvo executives in the past have said they won't sell
    Volvo, which Ford purchased in 1999 for about $6.5 billion.

    But with BMW's earlier interest and other deals taking place that are
    transforming Detroit, Volvo is getting scrutiny from industry observers.
    Volvo might be the most ready to sell among the company's brands, said
    Stefano Aversa, co-president of consulting firm AlixPartners LLP. He
    said Volvo is relatively disconnected from the parent company and is
    consistently profitable, unlike Ford's British brands.

    "They cannot sell Land Rover, they cannot sell Jaguar," said Mr. Aversa,
    citing Volvo's stablemates in Ford's luxury-car Premier Automotive
    Group. "They would have to give them away."

    Ford is looking at several scenarios to help it recover from operational
    and structural problems that led to a record $12.6 billion loss in 2006
    and a move in December to secure more than $23 billion in additional
    funding to help finance its restructuring.

    Ford shares were down five cents to $8.40 in 4 p.m. composite trading on
    the New York Stock Exchange after moving as high as $8.59 early in
    yesterday's session.

    Consolidation has come under an intensifying spotlight following
    bankruptcies and acquisitions in the U.S. auto industry, including
    Cerberus's agreement to acquire Chrysler from DaimlerChrysler AG earlier
    in May.

    Ford doesn't break out results from individual companies within Premier
    Automotive Group. Goldman Sachs recently estimated Volvo earned $260
    million last year. The group had a loss of $327 million over the same
    period, according to Ford.

    At Ford, managers are partially unwinding a buying spree that ended
    earlier in the decade after the company purchased several brands and
    other assets. The auto maker's North American business has suffered in
    recent years because of high costs and dwindling market share, sparking
    a need for additional cash and a refined focus on improving core businesses.

    Jefferies & Co. Managing Director Justin Mirro said the Volvo unit could
    be effective as a stand-alone company because it has its own
    product-development facilities and global dealer base. He also noted
    that Volvo remains a leader in passenger safety, long an advantage that
    Volvo has advertised.

    Several analysts also have speculated that Ford eventually will have to
    sell at least a stake in its Ford Credit lending arm, whose financial
    health has weakened because of junk-status credit ratings and falling
    global sales. Ford has said over the past year that the credit arm is a
    core part of its business.

    But any sale of Volvo or Ford Credit could be complicated by both assets
    being pledged as collateral on the auto maker's recently obtained
    financing package. If Ford were to sell Volvo, part of the assets would
    be devoted to paying back debt, while the remainder would be invested in
    the company. As for Ford Credit, Ford is confined to selling no more
    than 51% of the unit and would be restricted regarding how it could
    deploy proceeds.

    Unlike Ford Credit and Volvo, most of Land Rover and Jaguar aren't
    pledged as collateral on loans. Land Rover, purchased from BMW earlier
    in the decade, is enjoying a product renaissance.

    Mr. Mirro said despite Land Rover's focus on sport-utility vehicles --
    sales of which are under pressure in the U.S. because of rising gasoline
    prices -- the unit sells some extremely profitable vehicles and is short
    on production capacity, given global demand.

    Jaguar, however, continues to suffer from overcapacity and an aging
    product mix. Recently, Mr. Mulally expressed confidence in Jaguar's
    revitalization efforts.

    --Christoph Rauwald in Frankfurt contributed to this article.
     
    Captain Funn, May 30, 2007
    #1
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.