New S40 a good buy?

Discussion in 'Volvo S40' started by androo, Mar 9, 2006.

  1. androo

    androo Guest

    I'm helping my father buy a new car (in the UK), and come to the conclusion
    that an S40 would be ideal for him, perhaps a 1.6D S.

    What he wants is something safe, comfortable, quiet, not too expensive,
    well-designed, and crucially, short enough to go in his garage. The length
    rules out half the cars he might otherwise consider.

    We've had a test drive and liked it. From what I've read, owners are
    generally satisfied. Is this generally the case, would you say?

    Thanks.
     
    androo, Mar 9, 2006
    #1
  2. androo

    Steve Guest

    If I lived in jolly old I think I would buy an alfa!
    For what you are looking for, the s40 sounds great, but your hinda accord is
    what we across the pond are sold as an acura TSX, a lovely car as well.

    So many fine cars, so hard to choose!

    I think the Volvo is not a mistake but the hinda will be more reliable, but
    perhaps more common and laking in that special volvo comfort.
     
    Steve, Mar 10, 2006
    #2
  3. androo

    androo Guest


    Well, we tried the hinda, but didn't like it. Too long apart from anything
    else.

    Androo
     
    androo, Mar 10, 2006
    #3
  4. androo

    zencraps Guest

    How about an Audi A3?
     
    zencraps, Mar 10, 2006
    #4
  5. androo

    M.R.S. Guest


    OH YES!! Another Alfa enthusiast! ;)

    I've had an Alfa Milano (75 in Europe). Great car.

    Now I have my Volvo (760), while it is far superior to the Alfa
    (reliability), it just isn't fun to drive....
     
    M.R.S., Mar 11, 2006
    #5
  6. androo

    Steve Guest

    I have a 940 turbo wagon, my wife has a non turbo 850. I have my old acura
    integra I am selling BTW 91 with 150K I think would like $1200....

    The volvo is smooth and nice, but the acura is zippy and fun...sigh I will
    miss the old acura - my wife hated it and only was in it a dozen times in
    the 6 years i owned it...
     
    Steve, Mar 12, 2006
    #6
  7. androo

    androo Guest

    Thanks I guess. He's gone right ahead and bought an S40 1.6D. Very nice too.

    Androo
     
    androo, Mar 13, 2006
    #7
  8. androo

    Steve Guest

    If the market over there is like here, I would buy a 2 year old S40 if they
    are available yet. Volvos are wonderful cars, but they just do not hold
    their value!

    Enjoy the S40!
     
    Steve, Mar 24, 2006
    #8
  9. androo

    John Horner Guest

    Having just gone through the car buying process to replace my '96 850 I
    would pick a fully loaded Honda Civic over the S40. Believe it or not,
    the new Civic is a darn good car. The reliability and resale value are
    likely to blow the S40 out of the water and the driving experience is
    amazingly good. Spring for the Navigation system and you will get one
    of the best ones available, far better than Volvo's Navi.

    In my case I ended up choosing an Acura TSX over the S60. Far more car
    for the money IMO.

    John
     
    John Horner, Apr 22, 2006
    #9
  10. A caveat - recent Hondas and Acuras have been problematic. There was a
    period when the automatic transmissions they hooked to the V6s had serious
    reliability problems, including three failing within 60K miles in one Acura
    (Honda has been good about picking up the tab). The problem is supposed to
    be fixed now. Time will tell.

    Mike
     
    Michael Pardee, Apr 22, 2006
    #10
  11. I second that. I, too, chose the Acura TSX over the S60 (and the Camry and
    Accord). The TSX is far and away the best car $25K can buy. Of course, I
    was a little biased after my most recent (and seventh) Volvo died a horrible
    and most expensive death at 65,000 miles.
     
    Robert Lutwak, Apr 22, 2006
    #11
  12. androo

    Perry Noid Guest

    ".....Volvo died a horrible
    and most expensive death at 65,000 miles...."

    Details? sounds interesting!
     
    Perry Noid, Apr 22, 2006
    #12
  13. androo

    John Horner Guest

    True enough, but at least Honda extended the warranty on the troublesome
    automatic transmissions to 10 years, 100,000 miles unilaterally. I
    haven't seen Volvo do such a thing without having it's feet put to the
    fire by governments and lawyers as with the throttle body early failure
    problem. Volvo has had it's share of chronic problems with recent
    vehicles and in my experience is very reluctant to own up to any of them
    once the warranty is over. ABS module and A/C evaporator failures on
    850s anyone? I'm still angry about getting stuck for those costs
    shortly after the warranty on my '96 850 expired.

    Even with the transmission problems recent Hondas come out far better in
    Consumer Reports reliability survey than do recent Volvos.

    To top it off, for 2006 Acura increased the length of the powertrain
    warranty for all vehicles in the US to 6 years/70,000 miles in addition
    to the basic 4 year/50,000 mile warranty on the entire vehicle.

    Nothing is certain, but the data says that the probability of costly
    failures on a recent model Acura is significantly lower than for a
    similar Volvo.


    John
     
    John Horner, Apr 23, 2006
    #13
  14. androo

    John Horner Guest

    I spent several most enjoyable hours in my TSX today. What a sweet
    ride, and it returned over 32 MPG for the day with 85% freeway, 15%
    local roads driving. Smooth, quick, comfortable and finely tuned.
    One of the nicest driving FWD vehicles available today IMO.

    John
     
    John Horner, Apr 23, 2006
    #14
  15. You can read all the ghstly details in the archives of this group. The auto
    transmission let go (on the highway at 65 mph) and two different dealers
    wanted more to replace it (~$3500) than the book value of the car ($3000).
    Combined with the upcoming need for a timing belt, tires, and suspension
    bushings I was compelled to sell it to a junkyard for $400. This, despite
    it being a fine car and a joy to drive, right up until the moment it nearly
    killed me.

    Prior to that we had five Volvos, all RWD and all manual transmissions ('76
    264, '78 264, '76 262, '87 240, '89 240). This was our first FWD and our
    first automatic. I've happily moved on to the (6-speed manual) TSX and I
    hope we can replace the wife's 850 wagon before the transmission goes.

    Thinking back on the (hundreds of) weekends I've spent fixing Volvos and the
    dozens of times I've stood by the side of the road with my broken Volvo,
    waiting for the tow truck, I realize that there's more to safety and
    reliability than crash tests and odometer readings indicate. A car that
    frequently requires major repairs is not safe, no matter how safe it is when
    working.

    -RL
     
    Robert Lutwak, Apr 23, 2006
    #15
  16. androo

    John Smith Guest


    Couldn't agree with you more. My V40 costs a mint to keep roadworthy and
    if I could afford a new car I would certinly do it - and it won't be
    another Volvo. I'm sick of replacing engine mounts each service, sick of
    the high cost of routine parts and the latest when not only did my
    ignition barrel cark it and cost me over $AUD800, they (the service
    people at the dealer) also broke my bonnet cable, and then charged me
    just under $190 to fix!! (only after I had a fit). I rang Volvo
    Australia and was told they could do nothing about one of their dealers
    being so heavy handed. God knows how hard they must have wretched that
    cable to break it! Great customer relations Volvo, stunning!!

    Next up is timing belt, more mounts and I fear a power steering pump
    now.... The joy just never ends - what a painful experience owning a
    Volvo is!!

    John
     
    John Smith, Apr 24, 2006
    #16
  17. androo

    androo Guest

    In defence of the S40, my father has just bought one after trying just about
    every car on the market first. And he's entirely happy with it. I'm not
    surprised. It has an understated quality feel to it that's a cut above any
    of the Japanese cars we tested. The interior is beautiful, verything works
    with precision, and it's a very quiet car. The doors shut with a great thunk
    too. And it's incredibly well equipped: it's a UK model, and I guess most
    people on this group are from the US, but here the base 'S' version has
    climate control, cruise control, six airbags, DSTC, eight-speaker stereo,
    electric windows all round etc. etc. I guess in the US you can't get it with
    the sweet little 1.6 diesel engine in my father's, but I hear the 2.4 petrol
    is pretty good. The list price is high, but big discounts are available.

    Can't vouch for reliability and costs yet, but if I was choosing a car for
    myself, I reckon I'd get one too.

    Androo
     
    androo, Apr 24, 2006
    #17
  18. androo

    John Horner Guest


    We shall see if you feel the same after the warranty period is up :(.
     
    John Horner, Apr 26, 2006
    #18
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.