Spare engine - good idea?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by rastlouis, Aug 14, 2005.

  1. rastlouis

    rastlouis Guest

    I have the possibility of buying locally a spare engine and
    transmission for my 92 240 wagon. Mine has 310,000 kms and the spares
    came out of a vehicle with <150,000 kms. The engine and transmission
    work fine in mine, but I figure that at some point it may be useful to
    have a spare, should problems arise. Good idea, or needless use of
    storage shed/garage floor space?

    There are also many other parts available from the original donor
    vehicle. WHich ones do you figure would be more useful for me to pick
    up, for future use? Thanks.
     
    rastlouis, Aug 14, 2005
    #1
  2. I think it depends on the condition of the rest of the car. If everything
    else is in very good shape (including the plastic interior bits) the car
    might outlast the engine. At nearly 230K miles the engine and tranny of our
    '85 765T are two of the sturdiest parts.

    It might be useful to get responses from people who have had 240s for a very
    long time: if they had a replacement engine/tranny available, would they
    have used it at any time?

    As far as other parts go, I'll vote for keeping an AMM on hand. The fuel
    pumps might come in handy, too. I'm sure other people will remember more.

    Mike
     
    Michael Pardee, Aug 14, 2005
    #2
  3. rastlouis

    rastlouis Guest

    Thanks for your thoughts Mike. Indeed, these 4 cyl engines (and auto
    transmissions) have a reputation for lasting a LONG time, so it's not
    certain that I'd get to use the spare drivetrain. THen again, one
    never knows when some catastrophic failure may occur... The body on my
    92 is quite good, so hopefully it will last me a few years yet...
    I'll look at what else was taken out of the spares vehicle, and indeed
    I'll like to get a spare AMM, and maybe also the ECU and other such
    bits. Cheers!
     
    rastlouis, Aug 14, 2005
    #3
  4. rastlouis

    Bonnet Lock Guest

    In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
    I fear that Sod's Law will ensure that the parts which fail on your car
    won't be the parts for which you have spares from the donor car.

    The safest solution would be to buy the whole thing - and then canabalise it
    as necessary.
     
    Bonnet Lock, Aug 14, 2005
    #4
  5. rastlouis

    jch Guest

    _____
    Agree with keeping AMM as spare. ECUs vary from model to model. My
    son's 1986 wagon needed a differential replaced at 400,000 km. The
    overdrive unit (M46 tranny) was also replace a little earlier. I would
    be tempted to keep engine, tranny and rear axle (includes diff) if i had
    space.

    Regards / John
     
    jch, Aug 15, 2005
    #5
  6. rastlouis

    James Sweet Guest

    Those engines are pretty easy to come by, if you have lots of space and it's
    an exceptional price then it wouldn't hurt, but personally I'd pass until I
    needed one. Usually the rest of the car falls apart long before the engine
    fails.

    You could pick up the air mass meter as a spare though.
     
    James Sweet, Aug 15, 2005
    #6
  7. rastlouis

    rastlouis Guest

    You may have a point re: the engine (mine's been well maintained by the
    previous owner and likely has a fair amount of life left in it). I may
    pick up the transmission as I could fit that better in my storage area,
    and maybe the diff if he's got it. There's apparently a lot of boxes
    with stuff that was taken out of the rusty donor before it was
    scrapped. An AMM is definitely on my list! (picked one up in a
    junkyard a couple of weeks ago, but it's an earlier one 88 so won't
    work on my car 92). Cheers.
     
    rastlouis, Aug 15, 2005
    #7
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.