Volvo computer works backwards!!!

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Clive, Dec 18, 2003.

  1. Clive

    Clive Guest

    Hi guys,

    I was wondering if anyone out there has had a similar experience with the
    Volvo on board computer?

    It appears that the petrol flow sensor is fitted backwards, but I can not
    locate it on the car, basically, when on tick over the car reads that it is
    doing 11.1 miles to the gallon, and if it is driven it real hard, it can get
    up into the 50 to the gallon area. The trouble is, my Fiancée believes this
    is correct, and drives everywhere flat out.

    The car is a Volvo 480ES. Please don't sent me packing to the Register, I
    don't want to join them.

    Thanks

    Clive
     
    Clive, Dec 18, 2003
    #1
  2. Clive

    Bonnet Lock Guest

    In an earlier contribution to this discussion,

    It's not connected backwards - otherwise you'd get negative MPG readings!

    At tickover (with the car stationary) it's actually doing zero MPG - because
    it consuming fuel but not going anywhere.

    What does it read at steady speeds of 40, 50 and 60 MPH in 5th gear?
     
    Bonnet Lock, Dec 18, 2003
    #2
  3. Clive

    Clive Guest

    On the 480, when stationary, it goes to 3 lines --.-, then once you are
    moving it starts again. that's why it so silly, when driving well, eg,
    coasting etc, it is 11.1, then the harder you drive the car, the better the
    figures. It is an Automatic.

    Ta

    Clive
     
    Clive, Dec 18, 2003
    #3
  4. Clive

    Marc B. Guest

    Look to me as the computer is not calibrated in MPG but in liter per 100Km
    .....

    Mine (1999 S70 T5) as such a setting, when I'm gentle I get ~10 ~11 liters /
    100Km,
    when a realy floor it I get 50 liter / 100Km (50 seem to be the maximum the
    computer can
    handle ) and this is exactly what you're reading.

    Bottom line, your Fiancée is right.
     
    Marc B., Dec 18, 2003
    #4
  5. Clive

    Bonnet Lock Guest

    In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
    That would certainly explain it - because it is then reporting fuel used per
    unit of distance travelled rather than distance travelled per unit of fuel
    used. In this case, the harder you drive, the higher the number - and the
    bigger your fuel bill!
     
    Bonnet Lock, Dec 18, 2003
    #5
  6. You sure that you aren't seeing the instantaneous consumption in Litres per
    100 Km (Gall per 100 mile?).

    Cheers

    Hammo
     
    Hamish Alker-Jones, Dec 19, 2003
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.