Volvo vs BMW 325 repair costs.

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Flagelator, Jan 25, 2004.

  1. Flagelator

    Flagelator Guest

    At one time BMW repairs were expensive and Volvo repairs were cheap. The
    parts and labor were cheaper for Volvo. Is this still true or has Volvo
    succumbed to pie in the sky pricing?

    Bill
     
    Flagelator, Jan 25, 2004
    #1
  2. Flagelator

    Rob Guenther Guest

    Prices have gone up on the new ones. But the price of the car has become
    more reasonable. Our 965 was almost $40K Canadian in 1993, a similarly
    equiped V70 with turbo motor is around $45K now, with a nice 10 year
    difference... Parts prices are more tho.
     
    Rob Guenther, Jan 25, 2004
    #2
  3. my bmw was more $ to run and maintain than my volvos...
     
    ~^ beancounter ~^, Jan 25, 2004
    #3
  4. Flagelator

    Rob Guenther Guest

    A BMW has never even been considered by anyone in my family, because of the
    maintenance issue. Back in 1993 it was between the 960 and a Mercedes
    station wagon, the MB lost because it was more to buy, and more to keep
    running.
     
    Rob Guenther, Jan 25, 2004
    #4
  5. Flagelator

    Ole in LA Guest

    Both suck. I have had them both and paid $1000s for what should have been
    simple work.
     
    Ole in LA, Jan 25, 2004
    #5
  6. Flagelator

    Bob Noble Guest

    This kind of cost is strictly a Dealer issue. Since the manufacturer is
    unable to effectively control what the Dealer charges, anything goes!

    My friendly Volvo Dealer is also BMW and Porsche. The hourly rate for
    service work is the same for all three marques. Before deciding to stay
    with Volvo, I looked long and hard at the 330xi, being taken with such
    goodies as the computer sampling oil condition and telling you when to
    change it. Neat.

    In any event, most BMW stand alone stores see Volvo as a competitor and
    vice versa. Magically, parts prices to the consumer tend to be level -
    in our Reno market, anyway.

    bob noble
    Reno, NV, USA
     
    Bob Noble, Jan 25, 2004
    #6
  7. hummmm...we have had a few bmw's "in the family"...they are nice
    cars...esp the brakes (imho)...but...the extra $$ did not seem
    justified, once i started checking out the volvos and
    driving/owning...volvo seemed to me, to be more car for the $$...i
    have never owned a benz...i hear great things about them...i guess
    they are like a lot of cars...if you take care of them...they will
    take care of you...in a bit more confort...some of the new lease rates
    look good for the small 4 door benz sedans...
     
    ~^ beancounter ~^, Jan 25, 2004
    #7
  8. Flagelator

    Rob Guenther Guest

    Well BMW just never fit with us very well. They were smaller then Volvo's of
    similar money (still are) and we needed something to tow with... The 5
    series wagons would do the trick now, but back 10 years ago you just
    couldn't get one here (maybe they had them in Europe??? I don't know). The
    Benz wagon would have been nice, but it was too rare of a car in North
    America, my dad knew this... and the price difference wasn't enough,
    especially when we saw how much luxury the 960 included.

    I think i'd still go Volvo over BMW unless I wanted a serious driving
    machine like the M3 or M5... If I wanted a sporty car i'd probably end up
    with a VW GTI tho, i'd be afraid of losing an $70-80K bimmer to an accident
    or theft.
     
    Rob Guenther, Jan 26, 2004
    #8
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.