Interesting article

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gomer Einstein
  • Start date Start date
blurp said:
Just out of curiosity, what's the fuel efficiency of an aircraft
carrier? How about a fleet of them? What about fighter jet? What about
a fleet of aircraft carriers full of fighter jets?

Any chance we'll see any of those go hybrid?

Just wondering.
blurp


Aren't most big military ships nuclear powered? Submarines were
diesel/electric hybrids until nuclear came into the picture there.

Fighter jets all use gas turbine engines that produce astronomical amounts
of thrust (burning an equally astronomical amount of kerosene) and weight
reduction is of the utmost importance. A battery and electric motor that
could produce a tiny fraction the power would weigh more than the whole rest
of the plane. Besides, military and efficiency are oxymorons.
 
L David Matheny said:
<snip>

I agree with most of what you say. But the essential feature of a hybrid
for city driving is regenerative braking. Capturing the car's kinetic
energy
and then restoring it as the car accelerates back up to speed is what
allows
high city MPG. And it shouldn't take a very large battery for that.
More important for fuel efficiency is probably the ability to wait until
there is really a load for the engine before running it. At low power levels
combustion engines - especially otto cycle engines - are very inefficient.
Darned Carnot ratio. Diesels are better about that.

You're very right about the storage size for regeneration/acceleration. For
passenger vehicles the gross weight is a design number, and choosing a
target top speed gives the amount of energy needed for that mission. I think
that's why Honda went with ultracapacitors for their concept car; if you
don't need massive storage and the ability to hold it a long time, the high
charge/discharge rates of capacitors are very attractive.
Add me to the list of people who would love to see a Diesel/electric
hybrid.

I think Toyota is working on that for the European market.
 
Back
Top