CHOKE on this!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philip
  • Start date Start date
StingRay said:
Oooh! Temper, temper!

My gosh Nat, with all your aggresive talk of "killfile me", "kill the
others", we can only hope that you don't have a pointy object in your
hand!


Hmmm, could I buy a vowel? What the hell are you talking about? What
personal attack? Quote?


No Nat, I'm not the only one upset about it. I am the only one to
challenge it and that's a big difference. The rest have probably either
filtered the thread or killfiled us both. That's reality!

Stingray,

I have not read half the posts in this thread but ISTM that you are the one
perpetuating this thread by not letting it die. Your protestation about
another is like a pot calling a kettle black. We all can the that both are
the same apart from one bleating like a wounded sheep while still
crossposting to all and sundry.
Generally this is the behaviour of a low-life TROLL.

Huw
 
StingRay said:
It's easy to see why you, Hag and Brad were off on a tangent about
cigarette smoke in an automotive NewsGroup. We seem to have just proven
that you are easily thrown off topic. It's like an illness Nat. I threw
the three of you so far off your OT discussion that you became frustrated
and bailed to frienlier environs.

If I may offer some friendly advice, Nat, have you not heard of e-mail?
Why don't you, Hag and Brad simply e-mail each other, since you are the
only ones interested in this topic? Duh@Nat! Or start a new NG devoted to
the non-smoking bandwagon. Then you can hovel in your element. I'm gonna
miss you though Nat. Call me crazy, but I was enjoying experiencing your
hyperventilation! Now Nat, take a deep breath and relax. :-)

Arsehole [may I call you Arsehole?], what exactly have you posted about
exhaust pollution from diesel exhaust in this string? I ask this because the
OP had a comparison of this with cigarette smoke but the thread drifted
somewhat to one side. Thing is, I have not seen one post from you that has
been on topic. So why comment and criticise at all except to TROLL. Please
desist immediately dear Arsehole, because you do tend to stink worse than
either diesel exhaust or cigarette smoke.

Wipe yourself on the way out.

Huw
 
Huw said:
StingRay said:
It's easy to see why you, Hag and Brad were off on a tangent about
cigarette smoke in an automotive NewsGroup. We seem to have just
proven that you are easily thrown off topic. It's like an illness
Nat. I threw the three of you so far off your OT discussion that you
became frustrated and bailed to frienlier environs.

If I may offer some friendly advice, Nat, have you not heard of
e-mail? Why don't you, Hag and Brad simply e-mail each other, since
you are the only ones interested in this topic? Duh@Nat! Or start a
new NG devoted to the non-smoking bandwagon. Then you can hovel in
your element. I'm gonna miss you though Nat. Call me crazy, but I
was enjoying experiencing your hyperventilation! Now Nat, take a
deep breath and relax. :-)

Arsehole [may I call you Arsehole?], what exactly have you posted
about exhaust pollution from diesel exhaust in this string? I ask
this because the OP had a comparison of this with cigarette smoke but
the thread drifted somewhat to one side. Thing is, I have not seen
one post from you that has been on topic. So why comment and
criticise at all except to TROLL. Please desist immediately dear
Arsehole, because you do tend to stink worse than either diesel
exhaust or cigarette smoke.
Wipe yourself on the way out.

Huw

The OP really set a provocative bit of bait, didn't he!
 
Huw said:
And the cigarette smoke is not? Equally carcinogenic I mean.
Directly inhaled for maximum targeted efficiency:-(

Huw
Directly inhaled, I agree. But second-hand tobacco smoke is something else.
 
Marvin said:
Directly inhaled, I agree. But second-hand tobacco smoke is
something else.

Second-hand smoke is the same thing only diluted. ;-) So are you
comparing second-hand smoke at 10 feet with a new diesel car exhaust at 10
feet?
 
Huw said:
Arsehole [may I call you Arsehole?], what exactly have you posted about
exhaust pollution from diesel exhaust in this string? I ask this because
the OP had a comparison of this with cigarette smoke but the thread
drifted somewhat to one side. Thing is, I have not seen one post from you
that has been on topic. So why comment and criticise at all except to
TROLL. Please desist immediately dear Arsehole, because you do tend to
stink worse than either diesel exhaust or cigarette smoke.

Wipe yourself on the way out.

Huw [email protected].

Phew, (May I call you Phew?) you remind us all of that old saying: "You can
always tell an Englishman . . . but not much!" It is ironic that someone
British (the keepers of the English language) would post such gutteral
language in a public NG. We tend to forget that even ole England has its
ghettos. Crawl back under your slime covered rock. Phew! I can still smell
the stench. ;-)
 
Philip said:
Second-hand smoke is the same thing only diluted. ;-) So are you
comparing second-hand smoke at 10 feet with a new diesel car exhaust at 10
feet?

It compared particulate matter. It didn't compare carcinogens, or other
substances such as CO that are present in diesel exhaust, making it
potentially fatal in moderate doses. To say that particulate matter is the
only polution worth considering is a bit narrow minded, but the data is
probably accurate as presented. You just have to look past it to get the
whole story.

-Russ.
 
Somebody said:
It compared particulate matter. It didn't compare carcinogens, or
other substances such as CO that are present in diesel exhaust,
making it potentially fatal in moderate doses. To say that
particulate matter is the only polution worth considering is a bit
narrow minded, but the data is probably accurate as presented. You
just have to look past it to get the whole story.

-Russ.

CO (carbon monoxide) is quite present in cig smoke. CO is quite present in
pre-catalyst gasoline exhaust but nearly non existant in diesel exhaust.
 
StingRay said:
Huw said:
Arsehole [may I call you Arsehole?], what exactly have you posted about
exhaust pollution from diesel exhaust in this string? I ask this because
the OP had a comparison of this with cigarette smoke but the thread
drifted somewhat to one side. Thing is, I have not seen one post from you
that has been on topic. So why comment and criticise at all except to
TROLL. Please desist immediately dear Arsehole, because you do tend to
stink worse than either diesel exhaust or cigarette smoke.

Wipe yourself on the way out.

Huw [email protected].

Phew, (May I call you Phew?) you remind us all of that old saying: "You
can always tell an Englishman . . . but not much!" It is ironic that
someone British (the keepers of the English language) would post such
gutteral language in a public NG. We tend to forget that even ole England
has its ghettos. Crawl back under your slime covered rock. Phew! I can
still smell the stench. ;-)

Dear Arsehole. Pot, kettle, black. You'll have to do better than that. And
yes, some of us Brits do have a certain artistic and colourful command of
our mother tongue. You, on the other hand, are just a bore. A festering
stinking, puke inducing one at that. Far worse than diesel exhaust. [just to
keep on-topic].

Huw
 
Philip said:
The OP really set a provocative bit of bait, didn't he!

That's what comes of multiple crossposting off-topic stuff indiscriminately.
At least there was some car content in it I suppose. Arsewipe has not
mentioned any vehicle even once AFAICS.

Huw
 
Huw said:
That's what comes of multiple crossposting off-topic stuff
indiscriminately. At least there was some car content in it I
suppose. Arsewipe has not mentioned any vehicle even once AFAICS.

Huw

Hardly indiscriminant. That copy/paste header took several seconds to
accomplish! LOL

I just want to know if cigarette exhaust should be classified similar to
biodiesel exhaust since they both orginate from plants. (staying marginally
on topic)
 
Philip said:
CO (carbon monoxide) is quite present in cig smoke. CO is quite present
in pre-catalyst gasoline exhaust but nearly non existant in diesel
exhaust.

Absolutely correct and AFAIK diesel exhaust is no more carcinogenic than
that proven to be in cigarette smoke. No arsenic either.
In fact Peugeot have just launched a diesel range with effectively zero
particulate emission. I have not heard of such a clean cigarette.

Huw
 
What's the difference between a good nun and a bad nun?

A good nun says "Amen".

A bad nun says "Ah...men!"

DAS
 
"Hovel in your element"?

"Revel"?

DAS
--
For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

[...]
Then you can hovel in your element.
[...]
 
Just for my edification, Huw, are you actually English or Welsh? ... :-)

DAS
--
For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

Huw said:
Phew, (May I call you Phew?) you remind us all of that old saying: "You
can always tell an Englishman . . . but not much!" It is ironic that
[...]


yes, some of us Brits do have a certain artistic and colourful command of [...]

Huw
 
Dori A Schmetterling said:
"Hovel in your element"?

"Revel"?

DAS
--
For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

[...]
Then you can hovel in your element.

Ah man, why give this goofball a clue.? A recent study showed that the
people the least likely to recognize incompetence and stupidity are
incompetent stupid ones. Think how much more enjoyable this knucklehead is
when he thinks he's being witty, rather than understanding he's quite
dimwitted.

Geez....some people kill all the fun :^)
 
Philip said:
Second-hand smoke is the same thing only diluted. ;-) So are you
comparing second-hand smoke at 10 feet with a new diesel car exhaust at 10
feet?

Have you ever been behind a car or truck with a diesel engine that needs a tuneup? Did you notice the heavy smoke? Rather
common, isn't it? Is that like second-hand tobacco smoke?
 
Marvin said:
Have you ever been behind a car or truck with a diesel engine that needs a
tuneup? Did you notice the heavy smoke? Rather common, isn't it? Is
that like second-hand tobacco smoke?

Depends which Country you are in and how old the vehicle. Older vehicles
were built to different standards.
As for heavy smoke, then older worn petrol engines are the worse stinkers of
all, after 1970's petrol cars ['pre cat' over here]. Then come older diesels
and especially buses. Buses are particularly pungent which is ironic since
they commonly work in towns where a clean and neutral exhaust is most
important.

Huw
 
Back
Top