freon replacement for '90 Volvo GL? - - help a poor girl

  • Thread starter Thread starter sue sanchez
  • Start date Start date
Bev A. Kupf said:
.at = Austria
.au = Australia

Thanks...

I guess the mention that he was posting from a German server had
me thinking that .au. was Austria.
 
Bev A. Kupf said:
You're welcome. There's actually an ISO standard that defines the
two letter shortnames for countries and territories - ISO 3166. If
you're ever interested, here's what the chart looks like:
http://tinyurl.com/vtx9

Handy chart.

Thanks again.
 
In alt.autos.volvo Neil Nelson said:
Not once in the last nine years of usenet posting have I
advocated a position that promulgated the belief that R-12 was an
environmental hazard.

I don't happen to believe in the "positive-feedback system in
nature" theory upon which most of the "global warming" stuff is
based.

I am, however, inclined to believe that CFCs and HFCs do indeed
cause breakdown of ozone in the atmospheric "ozone layer",
causing a reduction in the effectiveness of this essential
natural UV filter... That is moderated, however, by the awareness
that the ozone density varies naturally and the natural variation
may be more significant than the effects of CFCs and HFCs.
-That- would have directly aligned my
beliefs with those of Lloyd Parker, and given the choice between
-that- and an enema with glowing Bar-B-Cue charcoals, I'd have
chosen the latter.

Lucky I don't know this Lloyd Parker. :-) I've heard the name
mentioned, and may have seen one or two posts in the past, but
your comments make it sound like I'm not missing much...
It runs on Freon? ;-)

Good to see that you've lightened up. :-)
Okay, so you have a 350 Chevy engine in your Volvo and it runs on
propane.

It was my question about running propane/butane blend in A/C
that started this little err... discussion. :-)
Tell me, are the lines that run from the storage bottle to the
regulator or mixer or injectors made from thin gauge aluminum?

Well, in this particular vehicle, the lines are all 5/16 ID hose,
but the other option if I'd felt like doing it the cheap way would
have been copper...

Using propane/butane blend gets the same pressures as R12, the
same thermodynamic properties, etc., so if the aluminium pipes
are okay for R12, they work the same with propane/butane.
That's not an answer.

It's the best you're getting. :-p
Okay, I guess I'm not so good at deciphering country codes from
address headers. <shrug>

Aside from mentioning that the answer is on my web site along
with some info about the straight-LPG Volvo, I'll give you this
clue: 32deg 56min S, 151deg 39min E using WGS 84 datum.
If it's being imported, it's not being done legally.
There are stocks of R-12 that due to recovery and recycling
efforts have proven to be sufficient to service what remaining
fleet of R-12 vehicles that exist.
Yes, eventually it will run out.

Oh, okay, so the collected stuff from decommisioned systems is
sold back for re-use?
You're way off base here. The fleet size of vehicles that
originally used R-12 is shrinking every year. Since our
government (for whatever reasons) decided to not adopt a
confiscatory stance on the existing private property known as
R-12, there is still a supply of R-12.

Okay. Fair enough.
If you have a problem with the morality of that policy, it would
be hard to convince me that it's not due to the different types
of government we live under.

I don't actually have a problem with the morality of that, but
I do think that it is very contradictory to then turn around and
ban a relatively environmentally benign equivalent on the basis
that, _if_ it somehow escapes from a sealed system that is
operating at pressures for which all of the components are
designed, if might be more flammable than that which it replaces
(even though the products of that combustion are less toxic).
 
athol said:
I don't happen to believe in the "positive-feedback system in
nature" theory upon which most of the "global warming" stuff is
based.

I am, however, inclined to believe that CFCs and HFCs do indeed
cause breakdown of ozone in the atmospheric "ozone layer",
causing a reduction in the effectiveness of this essential
natural UV filter... That is moderated, however, by the awareness
that the ozone density varies naturally and the natural variation
may be more significant than the effects of CFCs and HFCs.

This alone is enough to make one suspicious of the claims being
made.
Meanwhile, I do my best to abide by the law, follow the rules and
keep the gummint off my back.
Lucky I don't know this Lloyd Parker. :-) I've heard the name
mentioned, and may have seen one or two posts in the past, but
your comments make it sound like I'm not missing much...

Lloyd is a trip. Far as anyone knows, he eventually spent so
much time posting to usenet during work hours that he received a
reprimand from his employer (Emory University).
He still posts, but hasn't shown his ugly mug in any of the
automotive groups in months. No loss.
Good to see that you've lightened up. :-)


It was my question about running propane/butane blend in A/C
that started this little err... discussion. :-)


Well, in this particular vehicle, the lines are all 5/16 ID hose,

So the chance of a leak from a fracture from impact is minimized.
but the other option if I'd felt like doing it the cheap way would
have been copper...

In my mind, a bad choice due to what happens to copper tubing
from vibration.
Using propane/butane blend gets the same pressures as R12, the
same thermodynamic properties, etc., so if the aluminium pipes
are okay for R12, they work the same with propane/butane.

Except that in this country, the regulations regarding
pressurized flammable gasses as installed on an automobile used
on the public highways dictate that they meet certain safety
criteria.
It's the best you're getting. :-p


Aside from mentioning that the answer is on my web site along
with some info about the straight-LPG Volvo, I'll give you this
clue: 32deg 56min S, 151deg 39min E using WGS 84 datum.

I guess it's already been established that you're in Australia.
Or am I wrong again? (not that it really matters)
Oh, okay, so the collected stuff from decommisioned systems is
sold back for re-use?

Yes, depending on the venue where it's collected, laws vary from
state to state plus the federal regulations. At the repair shop
level, R-12 is recovered, recycled and then it can be reinstalled
in a vehicle. I believe that junkyards have different rule WRT
what they can do with reclaimed R-12, but I can't comment in fact
since I don't work in that part of the industry and have seldom
contact with junkyards.
Okay. Fair enough.


I don't actually have a problem with the morality of that, but
I do think that it is very contradictory to then turn around and
ban a relatively environmentally benign equivalent on the basis
that, _if_ it somehow escapes from a sealed system that is
operating at pressures for which all of the components are
designed, if might be more flammable than that which it replaces
(even though the products of that combustion are less toxic).

HC refrigerants are not banned, as I mentioned before, the stuff
is as common at swap meets and flea markets as rusty Craftsman
combination wrenches. The whole point of why it is not allowed
to be used in mobil air conditioning systems is that its safety
in use as a substitute refrigerant has not yet been demonstrated
-to- the regulatory agencies that have oversight over such
things. Other products with similar price and intended use
-have- been demonstrated and okayed by the EPA, so it's not like
it's an impossible daunting task, so one would think that if this
stuff is truly all that safe, it would have happened already.
It's like how you can't graduate 8th grade until you pass you
final exams no matter how smart you are.

I would also point out that even -if- HC refrigerants were
allowed to be used, as the rules now stand, they'd -still- have
to be recovered and recycled if the system were opened in the
course of performing service on an automotive AC system. Those
are the rules.
Now the question becomes; will the repair industry accept yet
another refrigerant and the requirements for handling and storage
given that we already have 2 de-facto accepted refrigerants in
current use? My guess is no.

As for the issue of toxicity, I have never heard of anyone being
poisoned as a result of a fire where R-12 was ingested into the
flame of the fire, i.e., a car crash or a situation where a
mechanic was smoking a cigarette, etc. while servicing an R-12
system. Yes, R-12 when combusted turns into toxic gas, we were
all warned during AC training not to vent R-12 into the intake
system of a running vehicle, but in over 25 years of servicing
AC, I've never seen or heard of it happening.
 
athol wrote:

It is insane that, while most of the developed world is phasing
out R12 and have not allowed its sale for many years, the USA
continues to allow its sale, meaning that they are continuing to
add to the problem.

Geez. How many of these jewels can you spew forth?

I used to consider Australia a place that I might like to live, since
the US is heading further down the collectivist bed-wetting path with
each passing year. But if your clarity of thought is any example, forget
it. And I guess there IS an up-side to you aussies having given your
guns away- you, for example, are a danger to yourself and others even
without one.

What part of "recycle" is too complicated for you to understand? The US
was the first nation to QUIT manufacturing R-12. It is illegal to
import. That which is available for sale is a combination of old stock
and recycled R-12. No one is "adding to the problem" over here. Now
stick that in your US-hating pipe and smoke it for all I care.
 
I used to consider Australia a place that I might like to live, since
the US is heading further down the collectivist bed-wetting path with
each passing year. But if your clarity of thought is any example, forget
it. And I guess there IS an up-side to you aussies having given your
guns away- you, for example, are a danger to yourself and others even
without one.

I think just about every country has its collection of loonies. Pauline
Hanson is a fine one down under.
 
So the chance of a leak from a fracture from impact is minimized.

Wasn't the intention, but it's a side effect. I was just too lazy
to play with bending copper lines, flare nuts and double flares,
etc.. The hose ends are very easy to install. :-)
In my mind, a bad choice due to what happens to copper tubing
from vibration.

Copper lines are used _as per US practice_ for lines between
the LPG cylinder and the filter-lock in the engine bay provided
that they are on the same component. If one is mounted on the
chassis and the other on the body, hose is required (but often
not fitted in practice).

Considering that I'm posting this in a Volvo group, I'll mention
an odd thing that I've noticed about copper brake pipes...

Our state registration authority allows copper brake lines on
the body of vehicles but not on suspension parts such as rear
axle housings and front struts. That's for modified vehicles.

So I was rather surprised to discover while overhauling the
front suspension and brakes on my 264 that all of the brake
pipes on the front struts and rear axle housings of all three
Volvos that I have here are original copper...
 
In alt.autos.volvo Steve said:
athol wrote:
Geez. How many of these jewels can you spew forth?
I used to consider Australia a place that I might like to live, since
the US is heading further down the collectivist bed-wetting path with
each passing year. But if your clarity of thought is any example, forget
it. And I guess there IS an up-side to you aussies having given your
guns away- you, for example, are a danger to yourself and others even
without one.

You'll be pleased to know that my wife is involved in national level
competition with pistols, and collected a new TC yesterday. :-)

Australia is unfortunately becoming more like the USA in many ways.

We still have a long way to go before we'll be as bad as the USA is
right now, though. :-)
What part of "recycle" is too complicated for you to understand? The US
was the first nation to QUIT manufacturing R-12. It is illegal to
import. That which is available for sale is a combination of old stock
and recycled R-12. No one is "adding to the problem" over here. Now
stick that in your US-hating pipe and smoke it for all I care.

I see. So instead of high temperature incineration to break down the
recovered R12 such that it ceases to be R12, you think putting it
back into cars so that a significant percentage can leak out into the
atmosphere is a good thing? That percentage that ends up back in the
atmosphere is why I said that the USA is "continuing to add to the
problem."
 
Neil said:
You're way off base here. The fleet size of vehicles that
originally used R-12 is shrinking every year. Since our
government (for whatever reasons) decided to not adopt a
confiscatory stance on the existing private property known as
R-12, there is still a supply of R-12.
If you have a problem with the morality of that policy, it would
be hard to convince me that it's not due to the different types
of government we live under.

My problem is that the R-12 now costs so much more. As for
the pollution, you could purposely let a pound of it
evaporate and cause less damage than a few hours from most
industrial sources.

Every time I go to pay my gas bill, I drive past a diner
and there's a huge amount of black smoke and such coming
from the vent on the grill. And that's just one source.

Now, they aren't releasing CFCs, but there are thousands
of sources that do in every city on a scale that's larger
than leaking cars.
 
athol said:
I don't happen to believe in the "positive-feedback system in
nature" theory upon which most of the "global warming" stuff is
based.

I am, however, inclined to believe that CFCs and HFCs do indeed
cause breakdown of ozone in the atmospheric "ozone layer",
causing a reduction in the effectiveness of this essential
natural UV filter... That is moderated, however, by the awareness
that the ozone density varies naturally and the natural variation
may be more significant than the effects of CFCs and HFCs.

I saw a show on NOVA the other day about the Earth's EM fields
and it looks like the are heading into two events in the next
couple of hundred years at once - an ice age and a pole reversal.

The later one is important - as it happens, the EM field strength
temporarily lowers and that makes the ozone holes appear and grow.
This is expected to last about 2000 years and then the planet will
recover, with the poles reversed.

But while it happens, the radiation belts will be much thinner.
Not enough to cause a problem(maybe double the rate of cancer
and not much else - btw, this also naturally encourages rapid
evolution changes), but the whole process if far FAR more
powerful than anything we are doing to the planet with our
puny pollution.

Of course, smog is bad - so reducing it is good. A couple of
percentage points lower ozone content is also a bad thing,
but not a disaster.
 
In alt.autos.volvo Joseph Oberlander said:
I saw a show on NOVA the other day about the Earth's EM fields
and it looks like the are heading into two events in the next
couple of hundred years at once - an ice age and a pole reversal.

My father was on about prophets predicting that stuff at least 10
years ago! :-)
The later one is important - as it happens, the EM field strength
temporarily lowers and that makes the ozone holes appear and grow.
This is expected to last about 2000 years and then the planet will
recover, with the poles reversed.

IIRC, they were also talking about the axis of rotation shifting
in conjunction with the pole shift...
 
athol said:
My father was on about prophets predicting that stuff at least 10
years ago! :-)




IIRC, they were also talking about the axis of rotation shifting
in conjunction with the pole shift...

Heh. Ants in a terrarium while a kid whacks the glass comes
to mind. Nothing we do short of killing off the oceans will
make a difference compared to these massive natural forces.
 
athol said:
My father was on about prophets predicting that stuff at least 10
years ago! :-)


IIRC, they were also talking about the axis of rotation shifting
in conjunction with the pole shift...

--
Athol
<http://cust.idl.com.au/athol>
Linux Registered User # 254000
I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.


I'm a Scorpio engineer; don't waste my time, I'm right!

Ed
 
Our state registration authority allows copper brake lines on the body
of vehicles but not on suspension parts such as rear axle housings and
front struts. That's for modified vehicles. So I was rather surprised
to discover while overhauling the front suspension and brakes on my 264
that all of the brake pipes on the front struts and rear axle housings
of all three Volvos that I have here are original copper...

I seriously doubt you found "original copper" brake lines on any Volvo,
made in any year, sold in any market.

DS
 
athol said:
Aside from legal reasons in some parts of the world, are there any
_technical_ reasons why not? Neither are corrosive. The correct
blend behaves exactly the same as R12, giving more efficient
operation than R134a converted systems. The closed system doesn't
present any more danger to the operators than with R12 or R134a.

_Technical_ reasons why not? I know people who have been running
this for several years, and I'm curious...

--
Athol
<http://cust.idl.com.au/athol>
Linux Registered User # 254000
I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.

There's lots of info on the internet about this. You can find out that
the mixture should be 60/40 propane/isobutane or 78/22. Both isobutane
(R600a) and propane (R290) are considered refrigerants by themselves.

There is a problem with this mixture that is common with any refrigerant
blend - the exact proportions are critical for the physical properties.
The molecules are different sizes, so leak out at different rates,
interfering with the properties of the blends. This compromises system
performance and complicates service and is the reason no auto makers
ever used a blend. (Note: R12 and R134a are both single molecule
refrigerants.)

Another problem with this is supply - often when you buy propane (or
isobutane), it's far from pure and contains moisture.

And of course there's the old, "It's going to leak out, become a bomb
and kill us all." argument. Actually the risk is very low, there's so
little involved, and the air fuel mixture has to be fairly precise for
any explosion, but it is possible in an enclosed garage, or an
underground garage where the heavier than air propane may pool.

--
Mike F.
Thornhill (near Toronto), Ont.

NOTE: new address!!
Replace tt with t (twice!) and remove parentheses to email me directly.
(But I check the newsgroup more often than this email address.)
 
Daniel J. Stern said:
I seriously doubt you found "original copper" brake lines on any Volvo,
made in any year, sold in any market.

DS

I believe in some European markets, "brake pipes" as they call them
are indeed made from some copper-containing alloy, or at least are
available aftermarket (and are legal) as I've seen them mentioned and
advertised in some British VW magazines (I used to have a neighbor who
had an English wife and was a huge VW fan; he'd pass on his magazines
to me when he was done with them)

AFAIK non-steel brake lines are not legal for street use in the US
however. Now I have seen steel lines with a copper-colored coating,
but that is something completely different.

nate
 
There is a problem with this mixture that is common with any refrigerant
blend - the exact proportions are critical for the physical properties.
The molecules are different sizes, so leak out at different rates,
interfering with the properties of the blends. This compromises system
performance and complicates service and is the reason no auto makers
ever used a blend. (Note: R12 and R134a are both single molecule
refrigerants.)

The same problem arises when filling an R12 system with many of the
"drop-in" R12 replacements available in the US. As far as I know, all
of them are blends. No A/C service center will service the system, and
as Mike points out, due to differential rates of leaking the blend
composition and refrigeration properties will change over time.
 
Back
Top